Subjective perceptual organization of a complex auditory scene.

Empirical research on the sequential decomposition of an auditory scene primarily relies on interleaved sound mixtures of only two tone sequences (e.g., ABAB…). This oversimplifies the sound decomposition problem by limiting the number of putative perceptual organizations. The current study used a sound mixture composed of three different tones (ABCABC…) that could be perceptually organized in many different ways. Participants listened to these sequences and reported their subjective perception by continuously choosing one out of 12 visually presented perceptual organization alternatives. Different levels of frequency and spatial separation were implemented to check whether participants' perceptual reports would be systematic and plausible. As hypothesized, while perception switched back and forth in each condition between various perceptual alternatives (multistability), spatial as well as frequency separation generally raised the proportion of segregated and reduced the proportion of integrated alternatives. During segregated percepts, in contrast to the hypothesis, many participants had a tendency to perceive two streams in the foreground, rather than reporting alternatives with a clear foreground-background differentiation. Finally, participants perceived the organization with intermediate feature values (e.g., middle tones of the pattern) segregated in the foreground slightly less often than similar alternatives with outer feature values (e.g., higher tones).

[1]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Patrick T. Goodbourn,et al.  A population study of binocular function , 2015, Vision Research.

[3]  Susan Denham,et al.  Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences: effect of number of simultaneous subsequences and frequency separation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  I. Winkler,et al.  Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Sue L. Denham,et al.  Modelling the Emergence and Dynamics of Perceptual Organisation in Auditory Streaming , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  J. Snyder,et al.  Effects of context on auditory stream segregation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Carolyn Drake,et al.  Perceptual attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Task-dependent costs in processing two simultaneous auditory stimuli , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  D. Woods,et al.  Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  A. Bregman,et al.  Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds within multistream auditory environments , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  L. Demany,et al.  Auditory attention is divisible: segregated tone streams can be tracked simultaneously. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Analyzing the Auditory Scene: Neurophysiologic Evidence of a Dissociation Between Detection of Regularity and Detection of Change , 2015, Brain Topography.

[14]  A. Mills On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[15]  I. Winkler,et al.  Preattentive auditory context effects , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  I. Winkler,et al.  Regularity Extraction from Non-Adjacent Sounds , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[17]  I. Winkler,et al.  Foreground-background discrimination indicated by event-related brain potentials in a new auditory multistability paradigm. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[18]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[19]  B C Moore,et al.  The role of spectral and periodicity cues in auditory stream segregation, measured using a temporal discrimination task. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[22]  M. Scherg,et al.  Neuromagnetic Correlates of Streaming in Human Auditory Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Alexandra Bendixen,et al.  Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  I. Winkler,et al.  Perceptual bistability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter? , 2013 .

[25]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of frequency and level on auditory stream segregation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  H S Colburn,et al.  Speech intelligibility and localization in a multi-source environment. , 1999, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  John F Culling,et al.  The spatial unmasking of speech: evidence for better-ear listening. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Objective and Subjective Psychophysical Measures of Auditory Stream Integration and Segregation , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[30]  B. Willmore,et al.  Temporal predictability as a grouping cue in the perception of auditory streams. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S. Sheft,et al.  A simulated “cocktail party” with up to three sound sources , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Clara Suied,et al.  Auditory Scene Analysis: The Sweet Music of Ambiguity , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: Psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings , 2010, Hearing Research.

[34]  J Blauert,et al.  On the lag of lateralization caused by interaural time and intensity differences. , 1972, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[35]  J. Hupé,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Auditory and Visual Bistability Reveal Common Principles of Perceptual Organization , 2006, Current Biology.

[36]  B. Moore,et al.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Alexandra Bendixen,et al.  Stable individual characteristics in the perception of multiple embedded patterns in multistable auditory stimuli , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[38]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Spatial selective attention in a complex auditory environment such as polyphonic music. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  André Brechmann,et al.  The Build-up of Auditory Stream Segregation: A Different Perspective , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[40]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Properties of auditory stream formation , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.