Geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment in Europe

Direct measurements of surface deformation due to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) in Europe have been so far mostly limited to the present‐day uplift area. Here, we use permanent GPS networks results to investigate the significance of GIA effects in Europe south of Fennoscandia. We show that uplift in Fennoscandia is surrounded by subsidence reaching as far south as the Alps, with a maximum vertical rate of 1.5 mm/yr between 50.5–53°N. Horizontal velocity gradients show shortening between Fennoscandia and north‐central Europe with strain rates of ∼10−9 yr−1 and principal compressional strain axis pointing to the Gulf of Bothnia in a radial pattern. We find a very good quantitative agreement with the 3D surface displacement predicted by Milne et al. (2001), although the increase of misfit in far‐field of Fennoscandia suggests that geodetic data outside of the uplift area may bring additional constraints to the rheological parameters used in GIA models.

[1]  Demitris Paradissis,et al.  Global Positioning System constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus , 2000 .

[2]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  Intraplate deformation in western Europe deduced from an analysis of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame 1997 (ITRF97) velocity field , 2001 .

[3]  J Johansson.  Continuous GPS measurement of postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia, 1. , 2002 .

[4]  W. Peltier.  Deglaciation‐induced vertical motion of the North American continent and transient lower mantle rheology , 1986 .

[5]  S. Williams.  The effect of coloured noise on the uncertainties of rates estimated from geodetic time series , 2003 .

[6]  Kurt Lambeck,et al.  Tests of glacial rebound models for Fennoscandinavia based on instrumented sea‐ and lake‐level records , 1998 .

[7]  J. Nocquet,et al.  Crustal velocity field of western Europe from permanent GPS array solutions, 1996–2001 , 2003 .

[8]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity , 2002 .

[9]  M. Watkins,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment observed using very long baseline interferometry and satellite laser ranging geodesy , 1999 .

[10]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment and the anomalous tide gauge record of eastern North America , 1996, Nature.

[11]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Ice sheets, sea level and the dynamic earth , 2002 .

[12]  J. Johansson,et al.  Continuous GPS measurements of postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia 1. Geodetic results , 2002 .

[13]  W. Peltier.  VLBI baseline variations from the Ice-4G Model of postglacial rebound , 1995 .

[14]  J. Johansson,et al.  Space-Geodetic Constraints on Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Fennoscandia , 2001, Science.

[15]  James L. Davis,et al.  Investigation of glacial isostatic adjustment in the northeast U.S. using GPS measurements , 2002 .

[16]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications , 2002 .

[17]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment and the anomalous tide gauge record of eastern North America , 1996, Nature.

[18]  G. Milne.  Space-geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment , 2001 .

[19]  Anna Maria Marotta,et al.  Combined effects of tectonics and glacial isostatic adjustment on intraplate deformation in central and northern Europe: Applications to geodetic baseline analyses , 2003 .

[20]  H. Habrich.  Combining the EUREF Local Analysis Centers’ Solutions , 2001 .

[21]  I. Shapiro,et al.  A spectral formalism for computing three‐dimensional deformations due to surface loads: 2. Present‐day glacial isostatic adjustment , 1994 .