Linear Lower Bounds and Simulations in Frege Systems with Substitutions

We investigate the complexity of proofs in Frege (F), Substitution Frege (sF) and Renaming Frege (rF) systems. Starting from a recent work of Urquhart and using Kolmogorov Complexity we give a more general framework to obtain superlogarithmic lower bounds for the number of lines in both tree-like and dag-like sF. We show the previous known lower bound, extend it to the tree-like case and, for another class of tautologies, we give new lower bounds that in the dag-like case slightly improve the previous one. Also we show optimality of Urquhart's lower bounds giving optimal proofs. Finally we give the following two simulation results: (1) tree-like sF p-simulates dag-like sF; (2) Tree-like F p-simulates tree-like rF.

[1]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  The deduction rule and linear and near-linear proof simulations , 1993, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[2]  J. Roger Hindley,et al.  Principal type-schemes and condensed detachment , 1990, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[3]  Jan Kraj mIček On the number of steps in proofs , 1989 .

[4]  Alasdair Urquhart The number of lines in Frege proofs with substitution , 1997, Arch. Math. Log..

[5]  Jean H. Gallier,et al.  Logic for Computer Science: Foundations of Automatic Theorem Proving , 1985 .

[6]  Rohit Parikh Some results on the length of proofs , 1973 .

[7]  N. Campbell Formal Logic. , 1931, Nature.

[8]  S. Feferman Lectures on proof theory , 1968 .

[9]  Stephen A. Cook,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of Propositional Proof Systems , 1979, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[10]  Gonzalo Navarro,et al.  Bounding the Expected Length of Longest Common Subsequences and Forests , 1999, Theory of Computing Systems.

[11]  Ming Li,et al.  An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications , 2019, Texts in Computer Science.

[12]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  How to Lie Without Being (Easily) Convicted and the Length of Proofs in Propositional Calculus , 1994, CSL.

[13]  Jan Krajícek,et al.  Propositional proof systems, the consistency of first order theories and the complexity of computations , 1989, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[14]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  Some remarks on lengths of propositional proofs , 1995, Arch. Math. Log..

[15]  Paul M. B. Vitányi,et al.  An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications , 1993, Graduate Texts in Computer Science.

[16]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  Exponential Lower Bounds for the Tree-Like Hajós Calculus , 1995, Inf. Process. Lett..