Critical levels of mask efficiency and of mask adoption that theoretically extinguish respiratory virus epidemics

Using a respiratory virus epidemiological model we derive equations for the critical levels of mask efficiency (fraction blocked) and mask adoption (fraction of population wearing masks) that lower the effective reproduction number to unity. The model extends a basic epidemiological model and assumes that a specified fraction of a population dons masks at a given initial number of infections. The model includes a contribution from the ocular (nasolacrimal duct) route, and does not include contributions from contact (fomite) routes. The model accommodates dose-response (probability of infection) functions that are linear or non-linear. Our motivation to study near-population-wide mask wearing arises from the concept that, between two mask wearers, the concentration of particles at inhalation should be the square of the mask penetration fraction. This combination, or team, of masks can provide a strong dose-lowering squaring effect, which enables the use of lower-efficiency, lower-cost, lower pressure-drop (easier breathing) masks. For an epidemic with basic reproduction number R0=2.5 and with a linear dose-response, the critical mask efficiency is calculated to be 0.5 for a mask adoption level of 0.8 of the population. Importantly, this efficiency is well below that of a N95 mask, and well above that of some fabric masks. Numerical solutions of the model at near-critical levels of mask efficiency and mask adoption demonstrate avoidance of epidemics. To be conservative we use mask efficiencies measured with the most-penetrating viral-particle sizes. The critical mask adoption level for surgical masks with an efficiency of 0.58 is computed to be 0.73. With surgical masks (or equally efficient substitutes) and 80% and 90% adoption levels, respiratory epidemics with R0 of about 3 and 4, respectively, would be theoretically extinguished.

[1]  Z. Feng,et al.  Influence of asymptomatic infections for the effectiveness of facemasks during pandemic influenza. , 2019, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[2]  Michael P. Atkinson,et al.  Quantifying the Routes of Transmission for Pandemic Influenza , 2008, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  W. Wei,et al.  Presymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 — Singapore, January 23–March 16, 2020 , 2020, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[4]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .

[5]  J. Wallinga,et al.  The Effect of Mask Use on the Spread of Influenza During a Pandemic , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  X. de Lamballerie,et al.  Evaluation of heating and chemical protocols for inactivating SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  Marisa C. Eisenberg,et al.  Dose-response relationships for environmentally mediated infectious disease transmission models , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  P. Anfinrud,et al.  Visualizing Speech-Generated Oral Fluid Droplets with Laser Light Scattering , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Chungsik Yoon,et al.  Comparison of filtration efficiency and pressure drop in anti-yellow sandmasks, quarantine masks, medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs , 2014 .

[10]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[11]  Benjamin J. Cowling,et al.  Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[12]  Xiong He,et al.  Risk Factors for SARS among Persons without Known Contact with SARS Patients, Beijing, China , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[13]  Wen-Yinn Lin,et al.  Filter quality of electret masks in filtering 14.6–594 nm aerosol particles: Effects of five decontamination methods , 2017, PloS one.

[14]  S. Blower,et al.  Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1) , 2009, BMC medicine.

[15]  Lawrence M Wein,et al.  Assessing Infection Control Measures for Pandemic Influenza , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Loretta A. Fernandez,et al.  Assessment of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks in Terms of Particle Filtration Efficiency , 2020, medRxiv.

[17]  Y. Li,et al.  How far droplets can move in indoor environments--revisiting the Wells evaporation-falling curve. , 2007, Indoor air.

[18]  P. Hariharan,et al.  A mathematical model for assessing the effectiveness of protective devices in reducing risk of infection by inhalable droplets. , 2016, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[19]  Benjamin J. Cowling,et al.  Influenza Virus Aerosols in Human Exhaled Breath: Particle Size, Culturability, and Effect of Surgical Masks , 2010, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[20]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[21]  D. Cummings,et al.  Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic , 2006, Nature.

[22]  Mark H. Weir,et al.  Development of a Dose‐Response Model for SARS Coronavirus , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  B. Murphy,et al.  Dose response of cold-adapted, reassortant influenza A/California/10/78 virus (H1N1) in adult volunteers. , 1984, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[24]  W C Hinds,et al.  Common materials for emergency respiratory protection: leakage tests with a manikin. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[25]  Lisa M Brosseau,et al.  Surgical mask filter and fit performance , 2008, American Journal of Infection Control.

[26]  Samy Rengasamy,et al.  Simple Respiratory Protection—Evaluation of the Filtration Performance of Cloth Masks and Common Fabric Materials Against 20–1000 nm Size Particles , 2010, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[27]  Dylan H. Morris,et al.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  P. Teunis,et al.  Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population , 2008, PloS one.

[29]  Tiina Reponen,et al.  Respiratory Performance Offered by N95 Respirators and Surgical Masks: Human Subject Evaluation with NaCl Aerosol Representing Bacterial and Viral Particle Size Range , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[30]  James E Kirby,et al.  Microwave-Generated Steam Decontamination of N95 Respirators Utilizing Universally Accessible Materials , 2020, medRxiv.

[31]  Yannis Drossinos,et al.  Dynamics of infectious disease transmission by inhalable respiratory droplets , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[32]  John W. M. Bush,et al.  Violent expiratory events: on coughing and sneezing , 2014, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Allan Bennett,et al.  Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? , 2013, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[34]  J. Watmough,et al.  Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[35]  T. R. Peters,et al.  Transocular entry of seasonal influenza-attenuated virus aerosols and the efficacy of n95 respirators, surgical masks, and eye protection in humans. , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[36]  James M. Hyman,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of the Effectiveness of Facemasks in Reducing the Spread of Novel Influenza A (H1N1) , 2010, PloS one.

[37]  P. Hariharan,et al.  Modeling the Effectiveness of Respiratory Protective Devices in Reducing Influenza Outbreak , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[38]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[39]  Jianjian Wei,et al.  Airborne spread of infectious agents in the indoor environment , 2016, American Journal of Infection Control.