A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring

BackgroundIntrapartum fetal hypoxia remains an important cause of death and permanent handicap and in a significant proportion of cases there is evidence of suboptimal care related to fetal surveillance. Cardiotocographic (CTG) monitoring remains the basis of intrapartum surveillance, but its interpretation by healthcare professionals lacks reproducibility and the technology has not been shown to improve clinically important outcomes. The addition of fetal electrocardiogram analysis has increased the potential to avoid adverse outcomes, but CTG interpretation remains its main weakness. A program for computerised analysis of intrapartum fetal signals, incorporating real-time alerts for healthcare professionals, has recently been developed. There is a need to determine whether this technology can result in better perinatal outcomes.Methods/designThis is a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Inclusion criteria are: women aged ≥ 16 years, able to provide written informed consent, singleton pregnancies ≥ 36 weeks, cephalic presentation, no known major fetal malformations, in labour but excluding active second stage, planned for continuous CTG monitoring, and no known contra-indication for vaginal delivery. Eligible women will be randomised using a computer-generated randomisation sequence to one of the two arms: continuous computer analysis of fetal monitoring signals with real-time alerts (intervention arm) or continuous CTG monitoring as previously performed (control arm). Electrocardiographic monitoring and fetal scalp blood sampling will be available in both arms. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of fetal metabolic acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.05, BDecf > 12 mmol/L). Secondary outcome measures are: caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery rates, use of fetal blood sampling, 5-minute Apgar score < 7, neonatal intensive care unit admission, moderate and severe neonatal encephalopathy with a marker of hypoxia, perinatal death, rate of internal monitoring, tracing quality, and signal loss. Analysis will follow an intention to treat principle. Incidences of primary and secondary outcomes will be compared between groups. Assuming a reduction in metabolic acidosis from 2.8% to 1.8%, using a two-sided test with alpha = 0.05, power = 0.80, and 10% loss to follow-up, 8133 women need to be randomised.DiscussionThis study will provide evidence of the impact of intrapartum monitoring with computer analysis and real-time alerts on the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes, intrapartum interventions and signal quality. (Current controlled trials ISRCTN42314164)

[1]  K. Rosen,et al.  How to assess fetal metabolic acidosis front cord samples , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[2]  Tiina Luukkaala,et al.  Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation , 2006, Journal of Perinatal Medicine.

[3]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  J. Westgate,et al.  How well is fetal blood sampling used in clinical practice? , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  Diogo Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. , 2008, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[6]  N Jakeman,et al.  Confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. , 1998, Paediatric nursing.

[7]  K. Rosen,et al.  ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor: Nordic observational multicenter study , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[8]  A. Ugwumadu,et al.  Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  T. Lander,et al.  Neonatal and perinatal mortality: country, regional and global estimates. , 2006 .

[10]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Cemach Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health , 2005 .

[12]  João Bernardes,et al.  Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians , 2010, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[13]  A Ugwumadu,et al.  Author response to: Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG‐ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  G. Visser,et al.  Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  J. Westgate,et al.  Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  A Costa-Pereira,et al.  Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[17]  S. Brophy,et al.  Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  K. Maršál,et al.  Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  M. Ross,et al.  Use of umbilical artery base excess: algorithm for the timing of hypoxic injury. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.