Analytic power calculation for QTL linkage analysis of small pedigrees

Power calculation for QTL linkage analysis can be performed via simple algebraic formulas for small pedigrees, but requires intensive computation for large pedigrees, in order to evaluate the expectation of the test statistic over all possible inheritance vectors at the test position. In this report, we show that the non-centrality parameter for an arbitrary pedigree can be approximated by the sum of the variances of the correlations between all pairs of relatives, each variance being weighted by a factor that is determined by the mean correlation of the pair. We show that this approximation is sufficiently accurate for practical purposes in small to moderately large pedigrees, and that large sibships are more efficient than other family structures under a range of genetic models.

[1]  K. Liang,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard Conditions , 1987 .

[2]  N. Schork,et al.  Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  C. Amos Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  J. Blangero,et al.  Genetic analysis of a common oligogenic trait with quantitative correlates: Summary of GAW9 results , 1995, Genetic epidemiology.

[5]  D W Fulker,et al.  An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[6]  D. Boomsma,et al.  Optimal Selection of Sib Pairs from Random Samples for Linkage Analysis of a QTL Using the EDAC Test , 1998, Behavior genetics.

[7]  D. Boomsma,et al.  A Comparison of Power to Detect a QTL in Sib-Pair Data Using Multivariate Phenotypes, Mean Phenotypes, and Factor Scores , 1998, Behavior genetics.

[8]  D I Boomsma,et al.  A Note on the Power Provided by Sibships of Sizes 2, 3, and 4 in Genetic Covariance Modeling of a Codominant QTL , 1999, Behavior genetics.

[9]  J. Blangero,et al.  Comparison of variance components and sibpair‐based approaches to quantitative trait linkage analysis in unselected samples , 1999, Genetic epidemiology.

[10]  J Blangero,et al.  Power of variance component linkage analysis to detect quantitative trait loci. , 1999, Annals of human genetics.

[11]  J K Hewitt,et al.  Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  P. Sham,et al.  Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  G. Abecasis,et al.  A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.