The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: behavior may shape attitude.

Following a previous study that reported a large number of young adult drivers text and drive, the current study investigated this behavior by looking at patterns of use and driver assessment of the risk of the behavior. The data from the current study converge with and extended the previous work showing 70% of the 348 young adult drivers surveyed report initiating texts while driving while higher numbers reply to texts (81%) and read texts (92%) while driving. Additional drivers also report doing these behaviors, but only while stopped in traffic, showing only 2% never text and drive under any circumstances. The drivers indicated that they perceived these behaviors to be very risky and riskier than talking on a cell phone while driving, but perception of risk was a very weak predictor of behavior (for initiating texts) or had no effect on texting (for replying or reading texts while driving). In addition, a factor analysis of the perception of road conditions while texting revealed that making the choice to engage in texting (initiating) led drivers to perceive road conditions as being safer than if they replied to a text or read a text, suggesting that choosing to engage in the behavior itself changes attitudes toward risk.

[1]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Detection of Road Hazards by Novice Teen and Experienced Adult Drivers , 2008, Transportation research record.

[2]  I. Brown,et al.  Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Todd D. Little,et al.  A Non-arbitrary Method of Identifying and Scaling Latent Variables in SEM and MACS Models , 2006 .

[4]  Frank Drews,et al.  Text Messaging During Simulated Driving , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[5]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Priyanka Alluri,et al.  Effect of Wireless Communication and Entertainment Devices on Simulated Driving Performance , 2008 .

[7]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  S. Mulaik,et al.  Foundations of Factor Analysis , 1975 .

[9]  Katherine M White,et al.  Dialling and driving: factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. , 1999 .

[11]  A James McKnight,et al.  Young novice drivers: careless or clueless? , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[13]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[14]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[15]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  R U There? Ostracism by Cell Phone Text Messages. , 2004 .

[16]  Neil D Weinstein,et al.  Misleading tests of health behavior theories , 2007, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[17]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[18]  L. Festinger,et al.  Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  L. Festinger Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[20]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Mobile phone use while driving: An investigation of the beliefs influencing drivers' hands-free and hand-held mobile phone use , 2010 .

[21]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  Wan2tlk?: everyday text messaging , 2003, CHI '03.

[22]  H. Geser Pre-teen cell phone adoption: consequences for later patterns of phone usage and involvement , 2006 .

[23]  Erik Nelson,et al.  The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Paul Atchley,et al.  Conversation Limits the Functional Field of View , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[25]  R. Kline Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[26]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Perceptions of smoking risk as a function of smoking status , 1992, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[27]  A T McCartt,et al.  Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[28]  J. Arnett,et al.  Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers. , 2000, Addictive behaviors.

[29]  Katherine M. White,et al.  The phone connection: A qualitative exploration of how belongingness and social identification relate to mobile phone use amongst Australian youth , 2009 .

[30]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[31]  F. Gibbons,et al.  A longitudinal study of the reciprocal nature of risk behaviors and cognitions in adolescents: what you do shapes what you think, and vice versa. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[32]  Heikki Summala,et al.  In-Car Cell Phone Use and Hazards Following Hands Free Legislation , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[33]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance , 2005 .

[34]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[35]  Rajesh Subramanian,et al.  Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes as a Leading Cause of Death in the United States, 2006 , 2003 .

[36]  Daniel R Mayhew,et al.  Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  H. Geser Patterns of multi-channel communication among older teens , 2007 .

[38]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[39]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[40]  J. H. Steiger Statistically based tests for the number of common factors , 1980 .