Deictic Roles of External Representations in Face-to-Face and Online Collaboration

This research explores how shared, learner-constructed representations serve as resources for conversation in face-to-face and online situations. An important role of shared representations in collaborative learning is to facilitate the ease of reference to previously introduced ideas. Complex ideas are more easily expressed when their component ideas can be indicated with simple gestures. Yet gesture does not have the same immediacy in typical online learning environments. We examined the extent to which gestural deixis is inhibited online, and how shared representations serve as conversational resources in other ways. Results show that gesture was almost never used online, and was partially replaced with verbal deixis and direct manipulation of the shared representation. Verbal deixis almost always referenced ideas already in the focus of attention, posing a potential problem for reflection on prior information. These results suggest the importance of better integration between communicative tools and shared representations and the inclusion of prompts for reflection.

[1]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[2]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Representational and advisory guidance for students learning scientific inquiry , 2001 .

[3]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Research on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 1997 .

[4]  Eckehard Doerry,et al.  An empirical comparison of copresent and technologically-mediated interaction based on communicative breakdown , 1995 .

[5]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[6]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An exploratory comparison of the roles of representations in face to face and online collaborative learning , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[7]  J. Walther Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[8]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[9]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Beyond being there , 1992, CHI.

[10]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[11]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning. , 2003 .

[12]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work , 2000, CSCW '00.

[13]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[14]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  The effects of representation on students' elaborations in collaborative inquiry , 2002, CSCL.

[15]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[16]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Learning by Constructing Collaborative Representations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternatives. , 2001 .

[17]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Smart machines in education: the coming revolution in educational technology , 2001 .