Pattern recognition of the electroencephalogram by artificial neural networks.

A back-propagation network was trained to recognize high voltage spike-and-wave spindle (HVS) patterns in the rat, a rodent model of human petit mal epilepsy. The spontaneously occurring HVSs were examined in 137 rats of the Fisher 344 and Brown Norway strains and their F1, F2 and backcross hybrids. Neocortical EEG and movement of the rat were recorded for 12 night hours in each animal and analog data were filtered (low cut: 1 Hz; high cut: 50 Hz) and sampled at 100 Hz with 12 bit precision. A training data set was generated by manually marking durations of HVS epochs in 16 representative animals selected from each group. Training data were presented to back-propagation networks with variable numbers of input, hidden and output cells. The performance of different types of networks was first examined with the training samples and then the best configuration was tested on novel sets of the EEG data. FFT transformation of EEG significantly improved the pattern recognition ability of the network. With the most effective configuration (16 input; 19 hidden; 1 output cells) the summed squared error dropped by 80% as compared with that of the initial random weights. When testing the network with new patterns the manual and automatic evaluations were compared quantitatively. HVSs which were detected properly by the network reached 93-99% of the manually marked HVS patterns, while falsely detected events (non-HVS, artifacts) varied between 18% and 40%. These findings demonstrate the utility of back-propagation networks in automatic recognition of EEG patterns.

[1]  A N Mamelak,et al.  Automated staging of sleep in cats using neural networks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[3]  David Zipser,et al.  UNSUPERVISED DISCOVERY OF SPEECH SEGMENTS USING RECURRENT NETWORKS , 1991 .

[4]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Petit mal epilepsy and parkinsonian tremor: Hypothesis of a common pacemaker , 1990, Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Doyne Farmer,et al.  Exploiting Chaos to Predict the Future and Reduce Noise , 1989 .

[6]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computational Neuroscience , 1993, Neuromethods.

[7]  A. S. Gevins,et al.  Pattern recognition of human brain electrical potentials , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[9]  Martin Casdagli,et al.  Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series , 1989 .

[10]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Computing with neural circuits: a model. , 1986, Science.

[11]  E. John,et al.  Neurometrics: computer-assisted differential diagnosis of brain dysfunctions. , 1988, Science.

[12]  J. Gotman Automatic seizure detection: improvements and evaluation. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Electric activity in the neocortex of freely moving young and aged rats , 1988, Neuroscience.

[14]  Nelson Morgan,et al.  Applications of neural-network (NN) signal processing in brain research , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[15]  Antoine Rémond,et al.  Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals , 1987 .

[16]  P. Gloor,et al.  Generalized epilepsy: some of its cellular mechanisms differ from those of focal epilepsy , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.