Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of sibship calculations using AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus

Abstract In circumstances where a known DNA reference sample from the deceased’s belongings or biological parents is not available, more complex kinship analyses are possible. The purpose of the work reported here is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the sibship analysis utilising multiple STR loci. Using all nine Profiler Plus loci, likelihood ratios for biologically-related siblings ranged from slightly less than 1 to over 45,000. When allelic dropout was mimicked, likelihood ratios ranged from less than 1 to over 1,000. Thus, the results of this study have a direct application to forensic laboratories faced with identifications involving sibling comparisons.

[1]  M. Bohnert,et al.  Confirmation of the identity of human skeletal remains using Multiplex PCR Amplification and Typing Kits. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  R. Wenk,et al.  Determination of sibship in any two persons , 1996, Transfusion.

[3]  A Walton,et al.  Automated DNA profiling employing multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat loci. , 1993, PCR methods and applications.

[4]  B. Brinkmann,et al.  The evidential value of STRs , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[5]  C. Kimpton,et al.  Validation of highly discriminating multiplex short tandem repeat amplification systems for individual identification , 1996, Electrophoresis.

[6]  D. Klarkowski,et al.  DNA analysis in disputed parentage: The occurrence of two apparently false exclusions of paternity, both at short tandem repeat (STR) loci, in the one child , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[7]  B. Brinkmann,et al.  The evidential value of STRs. An analysis of exclusion cases. , 2001, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[8]  Karen L. Ayres,et al.  Validation of short tandem repeat analysis for the investigation of cases of disputed paternity. , 1999 .

[9]  R. Komel,et al.  Parentage testing with 14 STR loci and population data for 5 STRs in the Slovenian population , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[10]  Colin Aitken,et al.  The use of statistics in forensic science , 1991 .

[11]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[12]  C. Frégeau,et al.  DNA typing with fluorescently tagged short tandem repeats: a sensitive and accurate approach to human identification. , 1993, BioTechniques.