Within-Individual Variation in Preferences

The purpose of this research was to explore how the values of travel time (VTT) and preferences for different modes vary within individuals compared with the variation between observed trips. With 6-week revealed preference panel data and stated preference data from a mode choice context, both collected in Switzerland, a revealed–stated preference logit mode choice model was estimated. The model was applied to simulate how VTT and change in consumer surplus vary across trips within and between individuals over the 6 weeks in response to a hypothetical congestion-charging scheme. The variation in VTT arising from income differences was found to be substantially smaller than the variation in VTT between trips. Moreover, the variability in VTT averaged over all trips within each individual was considerably smaller than the variability in VTT for all observed trips. Therefore, the assumption that variation in VTT between observed trips reflects the variation in the average VTT between individuals, which is usually made in equity analyses, will overstate the between-individual variation. The results suggest that if intra-individual variation in preferences is not taken into account, the negative equity effects of congestion charges are likely to be overestimated.

[1]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Can mixed logit reveal the actual data generating process? Some implications for environmental assessment , 2010 .

[2]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Meta-analysis of UK values of travel time: An update , 2011 .

[3]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Income and Distance Elasticities of Values of Travel Time Savings: New Swiss Results , 2008 .

[4]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  Investigating the distribution of the value of travel time savings , 2006 .

[5]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  The incidence of congestion tolls on urban highways , 1983 .

[6]  H W Richardson,et al.  A NOTE ON THE DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF ROAD PRICING REMEDIAL TREATMENT (MERPS) , 1974 .

[7]  John M. Rose,et al.  Allowing for intra-respondent variations in coefficients estimated on repeated choice data , 2009 .

[8]  M. Fosgerau,et al.  AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE ESTIMATION OF THE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME , 2006 .

[9]  Hanna Armelius.  Distributional Side Effects of Tax Policies: An Analysis of Tax Avoidance and Congestion Tolls , 2004 .

[10]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Preference Heterogeneity and Willingness to Pay for Travel Time Savings , 2004 .

[11]  K. Small,et al.  Product Differentiation on Roads: Constrained Congestion Pricing with Heterogeneous Users , 2003 .

[12]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Valuation of travel time savings for intercity travel: The Madrid-Barcelona corridor , 2014 .

[13]  Maria Börjesson,et al.  Experiences from the Swedish Value of Time study , 2011 .

[14]  Amihai Glazer,et al.  Which consumers benefit from congestion tolls , 2000 .

[15]  P. Mackie,et al.  THE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS IN EVALUATION , 2001 .

[16]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  Transport research needs , 2014 .

[17]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  The Institute for Transport Planning and Systems , 2004 .

[18]  O. A. Nielsen,et al.  Car Users’ Trade-Offs Between Time, Trip Length, Cost and Road Pricing in Behavioural Models , 2008 .

[19]  André de Palma,et al.  The Welfare Effects Of Congestion Tolls With Heterogeneous Commuters , 1993 .

[20]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary , 2004 .

[21]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS , 2005 .

[22]  C. A. Guevara,et al.  BEHIND THE SUBJECTIVE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS: THE PERCEPTION OF WORK, LEISURE AND TRAVEL. , 2001 .