Object trimming: When masking dots alter rather than replace target representations.

Five experiments demonstrate that when dots appear beside a briefly presented target object, and persist on view longer than the target, the flanked object is perceptually altered by the dots. Three methods are used to explore this object trimming effect. Experiments 1-3 assess participants' conscious reports of trimmed digits, Experiment 4 uses repetition priming to explore the target representation, and Experiment 5 examines the perception of apparent motion in trimmed targets. Results of all three methods indicate that object trimming is influenced by mechanisms of perceptual grouping that operate on target representations prior to conscious access. Separate contributions from visual crowding and backward masking are also identified. These results imply that common-onset masking does not always result from the target being substituted by the mask, but that target and mask can sometimes maintain separate mental representations.

[1]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  On the role of object representations in substitution masking. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  K. McGraw,et al.  The Integrity of Web-Delivered Experiments: Can You Trust the Data? , 2000, Psychological science.

[3]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  M. Sigman,et al.  Illusory displacement due to object substitution near the consciousness threshold. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[5]  Katherine M. Mathis,et al.  Gestalt grouping and common onset masking , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  The effect of smoking on sensory and attentional masking , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  C. Moore,et al.  When the target becomes the mask: using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Michael Pilling,et al.  What is being masked in object substitution masking? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  C Koch,et al.  Seeing properties of an invisible object: Feature inheritance and shine-through , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. Feldman What is a visual object? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  B. Burns,et al.  Geometrical illusions and the response of neurones in the cat's visual cortex to angle patterns , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  T. Oyama,et al.  Effects of Similarity on Apparent Motion and Perceptual Grouping , 1999, Perception.

[14]  J. Enns,et al.  On-line control of pointing is modified by unseen visual shapes , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  Paul Schiller,et al.  Stroboskopische Alternativversuche , 1933 .

[16]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Completeness and spatial distribution of mask contours as factors in visual backward masking , 1970 .

[17]  T. Kahan,et al.  Looking at object-substitution masking in depth and motion: Toward a two-object theory of object substitution , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Object-token individuation protects targets from object substitution masking , 2010 .

[19]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[20]  H. Werner Studies on Contour: I. Qualitative Analyses , 1935 .

[21]  R Fox,et al.  Effect of depth separation on metacontrast masking. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual Organization in Multistable Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[26]  J. Enns Visual binding in the standing wave illusion , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Frouke Hermens,et al.  Comment on "Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes" (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Masking by object substitution: dissociation of masking and cuing effects. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  J. Enns,et al.  Space and Time in Perception and Action: Object updating: a force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision , 2010 .

[30]  M. Chun,et al.  Asymmetric object substitution masking. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Visual interactions in the path of apparent motion , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Banaji,et al.  Psychological. , 2015, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.