Assessing optimal use of the standard dose adjuvanted trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in the elderly.

BACKGROUND Despite a long-standing vaccination programme, seasonal influenza remains a major public health problem in England, in particular for the elderly where a significant disease burden remains despite vaccine coverage approaching the WHO target of 75%. The recently licensed adjuvanted trivalent vaccines (TIV-ADJ) have been shown to offer greater protection for the elderly compared to the standard-dose non-adjuvanted trivalent vaccines (TIV), particularly for those individuals 75 years old and above for whom the TIV has limited effectiveness. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the TIV-ADJ for use in the elderly. METHODS We used a dynamic SEIR-type transmission model coupled with an economic evaluation framework, estimating the reduction in GP consultations, hospitalisations and influenza-attributable mortality. We assessed the optimal use of the TIV-ADJ by estimating the cost-effectiveness of programmes that used this vaccine in the 65+ and 75+ age groups. FINDINGS The use of TIV-ADJ is highly cost-effective for both target age cohorts with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios well below the £20,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) with over 90% probability that the vaccine is cost-effective at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £30,000 per QALY. INTERPRETATION The increased protection provided across all three influenza vaccine sub-types makes TIV-ADJ a more attractive option than TIV from the perspective of the healthcare provider, driven by the increased efficacy against A(H3N2). When deciding on the optimal use of the newly available vaccine it is important to consider the fact that TIV has very limited effectiveness for the 75+ age group, who would therefore get the greatest benefit from a more effective vaccine. FUNDING I-MOVE+ project (Integrated Monitoring of Vaccines in Europe) through the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement #634446 and the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Respiratory Infections at Imperial College London in partnership with Public Health England, as well as the NIHR HPRU in Immunisation at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

[1]  M. Faccini,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in the elderly. , 1999, Vaccine.

[2]  Mark Jit,et al.  The burden of influenza in England by age and clinical risk group: a statistical analysis to inform vaccine policy. , 2014, The Journal of infection.

[3]  S. de Lusignan,et al.  Uptake and effectiveness of influenza vaccine in those aged 65 years and older in the United Kingdom, influenza seasons 2010/11 to 2016/17 , 2018, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[4]  W. John Edmunds,et al.  Extending the elderly- and risk-group programme of vaccination against seasonal influenza in England and Wales: a cost-effectiveness study , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[5]  Nicholas S. Kelley,et al.  Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. , 2016, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[6]  W. John Edmunds,et al.  Assessing Optimal Target Populations for Influenza Vaccination Programmes: An Evidence Synthesis and Modelling Study , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[7]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[8]  S. Frey,et al.  Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59®-adjuvanted with a non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly subjects. , 2014, Vaccine.

[9]  Marc Baguelin,et al.  fluEvidenceSynthesis: An R package for evidence synthesis based analysis of epidemiological outbreaks , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  E. Brodkin,et al.  The comparative effectiveness of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in the elderly. , 2013, Vaccine.

[11]  R. Stalter,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine in adult hemodialysis patients. , 2011, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[12]  Edwin van Leeuwen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccines in England , 2017, BMC Medicine.

[13]  Katherine E Atkins,et al.  Effect of mass paediatric influenza vaccination on existing influenza vaccination programmes in England and Wales: a modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis , 2017, The Lancet. Public health.

[14]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of childhood influenza vaccination in England and Wales: Results from a dynamic transmission model. , 2013, Vaccine.