Ensemble-Based Computational Approach Discriminates Functional Activity of p53 Cancer and Rescue Mutants

The tumor suppressor protein p53 can lose its function upon single-point missense mutations in the core DNA-binding domain (“cancer mutants”). Activity can be restored by second-site suppressor mutations (“rescue mutants”). This paper relates the functional activity of p53 cancer and rescue mutants to their overall molecular dynamics (MD), without focusing on local structural details. A novel global measure of protein flexibility for the p53 core DNA-binding domain, the number of clusters at a certain RMSD cutoff, was computed by clustering over 0.7 µs of explicitly solvated all-atom MD simulations. For wild-type p53 and a sample of p53 cancer or rescue mutants, the number of clusters was a good predictor of in vivo p53 functional activity in cell-based assays. This number-of-clusters (NOC) metric was strongly correlated (r2 = 0.77) with reported values of experimentally measured ΔΔG protein thermodynamic stability. Interpreting the number of clusters as a measure of protein flexibility: (i) p53 cancer mutants were more flexible than wild-type protein, (ii) second-site rescue mutations decreased the flexibility of cancer mutants, and (iii) negative controls of non-rescue second-site mutants did not. This new method reflects the overall stability of the p53 core domain and can discriminate which second-site mutations restore activity to p53 cancer mutants.

[1]  J. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[3]  A. Fersht,et al.  Mechanism of rescue of common p53 cancer mutations by second‐site suppressor mutations , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[4]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. , 1994, Science.

[5]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structures of p53 Cancer Mutants and Mechanism of Rescue by Second-site Suppressor Mutations* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  T. Halazonetis,et al.  Structure–based rescue of common tumor–derived p53 mutants , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[7]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  A. Levine,et al.  The P53 pathway: what questions remain to be explored? , 2006, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[9]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[10]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  Novel Zinc Protein Molecular Dynamics Simulations: Steps Toward Antiangiogenesis for Cancer Treatment , 1999 .

[11]  A. Fersht,et al.  The tumor suppressor p53: from structures to drug discovery. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[12]  Frank M Boeckler,et al.  Targeted rescue of a destabilized mutant of p53 by an in silico screened drug , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  B. Brooks,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method , 1995 .

[14]  B. Foster,et al.  Pharmacological rescue of mutant p53 conformation and function. , 1999, Science.

[15]  Sebastian Mayer,et al.  Effects of Common Cancer Mutations on Stability and DNA Binding of Full-length p53 Compared with Isolated Core Domains* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  T. Jacks,et al.  Restoration of p53 function leads to tumour regression in vivo , 2007, Nature.

[17]  Gerard I. Evan,et al.  Modeling the Therapeutic Efficacy of p53 Restoration in Tumors , 2006, Cell.

[18]  X. Daura,et al.  Peptide Folding: When Simulation Meets Experiment , 1999 .

[19]  D. E. Griffiths,et al.  DMSO-enhanced whole cell yeast transformation. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Solution structure of p53 core domain: Structural basis for its instability , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Galina Selivanova,et al.  Restoration of the tumor suppressor function to mutant p53 by a low-molecular-weight compound , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[22]  T Darden,et al.  New tricks for modelers from the crystallography toolkit: the particle mesh Ewald algorithm and its use in nucleic acid simulations. , 1999, Structure.

[23]  Sophie North,et al.  Restoration of wild‐type conformation and activity of a temperature‐sensitive mutant of p53 (p53V272M) by the cytoprotective aminothiol WR1065 in the esophageal cancer cell line TE‐1 , 2002, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[24]  A. Fersht,et al.  Semirational design of active tumor suppressor p53 DNA binding domain with enhanced stability. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Fersht,et al.  Crystal Structure of a Superstable Mutant of Human p53 Core Domain , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[27]  Ting Wang,et al.  A global suppressor motif for p53 cancer mutants. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structural basis for understanding oncogenic p53 mutations and designing rescue drugs , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[30]  Youngho Seo,et al.  Selective activation of p53-mediated tumour suppression in high-grade tumours , 2010, Nature.

[31]  Xin Lu,et al.  Live or let die: the cell's response to p53 , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[32]  J. Boeke,et al.  Genetic selection of intragenic suppressor mutations that reverse the effect of common p53 cancer mutations , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[33]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[35]  A. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[36]  A. Fersht,et al.  Quantitative analysis of residual folding and DNA binding in mutant p53 core domain: definition of mutant states for rescue in cancer therapy , 2000, Oncogene.

[37]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[38]  Francisco J. Sánchez-Rivera,et al.  Stage-specific sensitivity to p53 restoration during lung cancer progression , 2010, Nature.

[39]  A. Fersht,et al.  Thermodynamic stability of wild-type and mutant p53 core domain. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Hideyuki Tsuboi,et al.  A graph theoretical approach to the effect of mutation on the flexibility of the DNA binding domain of p53 protein , 2009 .

[41]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[42]  Richard H. Lathrop,et al.  All-codon scanning identifies p53 cancer rescue mutations , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  Galina Selivanova,et al.  Mutant p53-dependent growth suppression distinguishes PRIMA-1 from known anticancer drugs: a statistical analysis of information in the National Cancer Institute database. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[44]  Tirso Pons,et al.  Homology modeling, model and software evaluation: three related resources , 1998, Bioinform..

[45]  Peter Kaiser,et al.  Predicting Positive p53 Cancer Rescue Regions Using Most Informative Positive (MIP) Active Learning , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..