Calibration of fundus images using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Measurements performed on fundus images using current software are not accurate. Accurate measurements can be obtained only by calibrating a fundus camera using measurements between fixed retinal landmarks, such as the dimensions of the optic nerve, or by relying on a calibrated model eye provided by a reading center. However, calibrated spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) could offer a convenient alternative method for the calibration of any fundus image. PATIENTS AND METHODS The ability to measure exact distances on SD-OCT fundus images was tested by measuring the distance between the center of the fovea and the optic nerve. Calibrated SD-OCT scans measuring 6 X 6 X 2 mm centered on the fovea and the optic nerve were analyzed in 50 healthy right eyes. The foveal center was identified using cross-sectional SD-OCT images, and the center of the optic nerve was identified manually. The SD-OCT scans were registered to each other, and the distances between the center of the optic nerve and fovea were calculated. The overlay of these SD-OCT fundus images on photographic fundus images was performed. RESULTS Any image of the fundus could be calibrated by overlaying the SD-OCT fundus image, and the measurements were consistent with previously defined calibration methods. The mean distance between the center of the fovea and the center of the optic nerve was 4.32 +/-0.32 mm. The line from the center of the optic nerve to the foveal center had a mean declination of 7.67 +/- 3.88 degrees. Mean horizontal displacement and vertical displacement were 4.27 +/- 0.29 mm and 0.58 +/- 0.29 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The overlay of the SD-OCT fundus image provides a convenient method for calibrating any image of the fundus. This approach should provide a uniform standard when comparing images from different devices and from different reading centers.

[1]  G. Dutton,et al.  The disc-macula distance to disc diameter ratio: a new test for confirming optic nerve hypoplasia in young children. , 1988, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[2]  D. Barr Estimation of optic disc size. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  J. Jonas,et al.  Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  A. G. Bennett,et al.  Improvements on Littmann's method of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography , 1994, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[5]  C. Weir,et al.  An appraisal of the disc–macula distance to disc diameter ratio in the assessment of optic disc size , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  Shuliang Jiao,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of sectional and fundus ophthalmic images with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Optics express.

[7]  T. Williams,et al.  Position of the Fovea Centralis with Respect to the Optic Nerve Head , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[8]  S. Duke-Elder System of Ophthalmology , 1962 .

[9]  E. Chihara,et al.  Covariation of optic disc measurements and ocular parameters in the healthy eye , 1994, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[11]  The Age-Related Eye Disease Study system for classifying age-related macular degeneration from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Report Number 6. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  K. Rohrschneider Determination of the location of the fovea on the fundus. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  J. Vander,et al.  The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Severity Scale for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: AREDS Report No 17 , 2006 .

[14]  N. Bressler,et al.  The use of fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms in the identification and treatment of choroidal neovascularization in the Macular Photocoagulation Study. The Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[15]  D. Barr An appraisal of the accuracy of Littmann's method of determining the real dimension of a retinal object. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement.

[16]  M. Wakakura,et al.  A simple clinical method of assessing patients with optic nerve hypoplasia The disc‐macula distance to disc diameter ratio (DM/DD) , 1987, Acta ophthalmologica.

[17]  Jost B. Jonas,et al.  Variability of the real dimensions of normal human optic discs , 2005, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[18]  R. Klein,et al.  Comparison of retinal vessel measurements in digital vs film images. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Matthew D. Davis,et al.  The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 17. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.