An Adaptable System to Support Provenance Management for the Public Policy-Making Process in Smart Cities

Government policies aim to address public issues and problems and therefore play a pivotal role in people’s lives. The creation of public policies, however, is complex given the perspective of large and diverse stakeholders’ involvement, considerable human participation, lengthy processes, complex task specification and the non-deterministic nature of the process. The inherent complexities of the policy process impart challenges for designing a computing system that assists in supporting and automating the business process pertaining to policy setup, which also raises concerns for setting up a tracking service in the policy-making environment. A tracking service informs how decisions have been taken during policy creation and can provide useful and intrinsic information regarding the policy process. At present, there exists no computing system that assists in tracking the complete process that has been employed for policy creation. To design such a system, it is important to consider the policy environment challenges; for this a novel network and goal based approach has been framed and is covered in detail in this paper. Furthermore, smart governance objectives that include stakeholders’ participation and citizens’ involvement have been considered. Thus, the proposed approach has been devised by considering smart governance principles and the knowledge environment of policy making where tasks are largely dependent on policy makers’ decisions and on individual policy objectives. Our approach reckons the human dimension for deciding and defining autonomous process activities at run time. Furthermore, with the network-based approach, so-called provenance data tracking is employed which enables the capture of policy process.

[1]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Process Mining - Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes , 2011 .

[2]  Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar,et al.  Smart Cities: Big Cities, Complex Governance? , 2015 .

[3]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  myGrid: personalised bioinformatics on the information grid , 2003, ISMB.

[4]  Ludwig Nastansky,et al.  Applying topic maps to ad hoc workflows for semantic associative navigation in process networks , 2001, Proceedings Seventh International Workshop on Groupware. CRIWG 2001.

[5]  Reiner Siebert,et al.  An Open Architecture for Adaptive Workflow Management Systems , 1999, Trans. SDPS.

[6]  Margarita Angelidou,et al.  Smart city policies: A spatial approach , 2014 .

[7]  António Rito Silva A Blended Workflow Approach , 2011, Business Process Management Workshops.

[8]  David Ludlow,et al.  ICT enabled participatory urban planning and policy development: The UrbanAPI project , 2014 .

[9]  Henk de Man,et al.  Case Management: A Review of Modeling Approaches , 2009 .

[10]  Keith Harrison-Broninski,et al.  Human Interactions: The Heart And Soul Of Business Process Management: How People Reallly Work And How They Can Be Helped To Work Better , 2005 .

[11]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Goal-based business process models: creation and evaluation , 1997, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[12]  Richard McClatchey,et al.  A Network-based Approach to Capture Provenance of a Policy-making Process , 2017, IDEAS.

[13]  Ralph Bergmann,et al.  Case-based adaptation of workflows , 2014, Inf. Syst..

[14]  C. Harrison,et al.  A Theory of Smart Cities , 2011 .

[15]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Supporting Public Policy Making Processes with Workflow Technology: Lessons Learned From Cases in Four European Countries , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[16]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The Impact of Social Business Process Management on Policy-making in e-Government , 2017, HICSS.

[17]  Sarah Barns,et al.  Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance , 2017 .

[18]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Ad-hoc workflow: problems and solutions , 1997, Database and Expert Systems Applications. 8th International Conference, DEXA '97. Proceedings.

[19]  Nikhil Ichalkaranje,et al.  Transforming e-Government to Smart Government: A South Australian Perspective , 2015 .

[20]  Richard N. Taylor,et al.  Techniques for Supporting Dynamic and Adaptive Workflow , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Zaheer Abbas Khan,et al.  Developing Knowledge-Based Citizen Participation Platform to Support Smart City Decision Making: The Smarticipate Case Study , 2017, Inf..

[22]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The significance of digital data systems for smart city policy , 2017 .

[23]  Beate List,et al.  A UML 2 Profile for Business Process Modelling , 2005, ER.

[24]  Peter Parycek,et al.  Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era , 2016, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[25]  Michael Hallsworth,et al.  Policy-Making in the Real World , 2011 .

[26]  M. Bolívar,et al.  Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance , 2016 .

[27]  Schahram Dustdar,et al.  Caramba—A Process-Aware Collaboration System Supporting Ad hoc and Collaborative Processes in Virtual Teams , 2004, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[28]  Francisco Curbera,et al.  Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0 , 2007 .

[29]  Ludwig Nastansky,et al.  GroupProcess: using process knowledge from the participative design and practical operation of ad hoc processes for the design of structured workflows , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[32]  H. Scholl,et al.  Smart Governance: A Roadmap for Research and Practice , 2014 .

[33]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Smart government, citizen participation and open data , 2014, Inf. Polity.

[34]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  The changing face of a city government: A case study of Philly311 , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  ariadne staff,et al.  The Information Grid , 2002 .

[36]  Tengjiao Wang,et al.  Easy Flow: New Generation Business Process Model , 2009, APWeb/WAIM Workshops.

[37]  Sumi Helal,et al.  An Ad-Hoc Workflow System Architecture Based on Mobile Agents and Rule-Based Processing , 2000 .

[38]  Farhana Sajjad,et al.  An analytical framework for workflow technology adoption in local government authorities , 2014 .

[39]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[40]  Kawa Nazemi,et al.  The FUPOL Policy Lifecycle , 2014 .

[41]  Richard McClatchey,et al.  Using a Model-driven Approach in Building a Provenance Framework for Tracking Policy-making Processes in Smart Cities , 2017, IDEAS.

[42]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Mining of ad-hoc business processes with TeamLog , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[43]  Adriane Chapman,et al.  What do we do now? Workflows for an unpredictable world , 2015, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[44]  Christoph Bussler,et al.  On Structured Workflow Modelling , 2000, CAiSE.