Optimum Propulsion Technique in Different Wheelchair Handrim Diameter

Variability in the propulsion technique to manual wheelchair users due to differences in level of injury and wheelchair fit makes detection of subtle changes in technique due to manipulation of individual variables nearly impossible. However, such changes are well suited to analytical modeling techniques, since variables can be manipulated systematically and the effects of the manipulation can be easily quantified. Therefore, we develop a simple two-dimensional model of the upper arm, forearm, and wheelchair wheel to study changes in wheelchair-user interface. Variations in handrim diameter were examined for their influence in the propulsive moment generated by each subject. The larger the handrim, the greater the moment about the wheel axle M(subscript r) could attain. The tangential force F(subscript t) applied to the handrim was similar among three handrim diameters. However, the radial component of force applied to the handrim increased as handrim diameter decreased. Increasing rim diameter increased the fraction effective force. Both predicted M(subscript r) and F(subscript t) reached the peak value in the terminal propulsion phase, in agreement with experimental results of the quasi-static wheelchair propulsion, but not dynamic, cyclic wheelchair propulsion. During the middle to terminal propulsion phase, the optimized force vector is not tangential to the handrim and instead, it pass through the upper arm segment which is comparable to dynamic wheelchair propulsion. Optimum analysis could help us to identify the effect of handrim diameter and investigate the related characteristics. Also, through modeling, the mechanical constraints of force application and the inadequate of pushing technique are further understood.

[1]  H E Veeger,et al.  Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: cross-sectional analysis. , 1998, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  D. Theisen,et al.  Wheelchair Propulsion Biomechanics , 2001, Sports medicine.

[3]  L A Rozendaal,et al.  Force direction in manual wheel chair propulsion: balance between effect and cost. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Electromyographic activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion by paraplegic persons. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  S. D. Shimada,et al.  Three-dimensional pushrim forces during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[6]  Gaines Rf,et al.  Users' responses to contoured wheelchair handrims. , 1986 .

[7]  R N Robertson,et al.  Pushrim forces and joint kinetics during wheelchair propulsion. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  R A Cooper,et al.  A systems approach to the modeling of racing wheelchair propulsion. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  P E Patterson,et al.  Modelling the propulsion characteristics of a standard wheelchair. , 1994, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  R A Cooper,et al.  Methods for determining three-dimensional wheelchair pushrim forces and moments: a technical note. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  H E Veeger,et al.  Wheelchair racing: effects of rim diameter and speed on physiology and technique. , 1988, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  H E Veeger,et al.  Propulsion technique in hand rim wheelchair ambulation. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[13]  R H Rozendal,et al.  Seat height in handrim wheelchair propulsion. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  R H Rozendal,et al.  The effect of rear wheel camber in manual wheelchair propulsion. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  C E Brubaker,et al.  Biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion as a function of seat position and user-to-chair interface. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  H E Veeger,et al.  Quasi-static analysis of muscle forces in the shoulder mechanism during wheelchair propulsion. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  R F Gaines,et al.  Users' responses to contoured wheelchair handrims. , 1986, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  M Lamontagne,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  H. Veeger,et al.  The effect of wheelchair handrim tube diameter on propulsion efficiency and force application (tube diameter and efficiency in wheelchairs). , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  H E Veeger,et al.  Within-cycle characteristics of the wheelchair push in sprinting on a wheelchair ergometer. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  H E Veeger,et al.  Effect of handrim velocity on mechanical efficiency in wheelchair propulsion. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.