Transcription factor competition allows embryonic stem cells to distinguish authentic signals from noise.

Stem cells occupy variable environments where they must distinguish stochastic fluctuations from developmental cues. Here, we use optogenetics to investigate how the pluripotency network in embryonic stem (ES) cells achieves a robust response to differentiation cues but not to gene expression fluctuations. We engineered ES cells in which we could quantitatively ontrol the endogenous mechanism of neural differentiation through a light-inducible Brn2 transgene and monitor differentiation status through a genome-integrated Nanog-GFP reporter. By exposing cells to pulses of Brn2, we find that the pluripotency network rejects Brn2 inputs that are below specific magnitude or duration thresholds, but allows rapid differentiation when both thresholds are satisfied. The filtering properties of the network arise through its positive feedback architecture and the intrinsic half-life of Nanog, which determines the duration threshold in the network. Together our results suggest that the dynamic properties of positive-feedback networks might determine how inputs are classified as signal or noise by stem cells.

[1]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[2]  Hao Yuan Kueh,et al.  Positive Feedback Between PU.1 and the Cell Cycle Controls Myeloid Differentiation , 2013, Science.

[3]  Abraham P. Fong,et al.  Skeletal muscle programming and re-programming. , 2013, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[4]  T. Enver,et al.  Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.

[5]  Bing Lim,et al.  A precarious balance: pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[6]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells , 2014, Nature.

[7]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Dynamic Properties of Network Motifs Contribute to Biological Network Organization , 2005, PLoS biology.

[8]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  The promise of optogenetics in cell biology: interrogating molecular circuits in space and time , 2011, Nature Methods.

[9]  H. Hamada,et al.  A CNS-specific POU transcription factor, Brn-2, is required for establishing mammalian neural cell lineages , 1993, Neuron.

[10]  R. Young,et al.  Super-Enhancers in the Control of Cell Identity and Disease , 2013, Cell.

[11]  Paul François,et al.  Phenotypic models of evolution and development: geometry as destiny. , 2012, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[12]  Yi Yang,et al.  Spatiotemporal control of gene expression by a light-switchable transgene system , 2012, Nature Methods.

[13]  Kit T. Rodolfa,et al.  Sox17 promotes differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells by directly regulating extraembryonic gene expression and indirectly antagonizing self-renewal. , 2010, Genes & development.

[14]  M. Greaves,et al.  Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. , 1997, Genes & development.

[15]  Matt Thomson,et al.  Pluripotency Factors in Embryonic Stem Cells Regulate Differentiation into Germ Layers , 2011, Cell.

[16]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Guoliang Xu,et al.  Different Transcription Factors Regulate nestin Gene Expression during P19 Cell Neural Differentiation and Central Nervous System Development* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  J. Shu,et al.  Induction of Pluripotency in Mouse Somatic Cells with Lineage Specifiers , 2013, Cell.

[19]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[20]  J. Gunawardena,et al.  Unlimited multistability in multisite phosphorylation systems , 2009, Nature.

[21]  P. Vanderhaeghen Wnts blow on NeuroD1 to promote adult neuron production and diversity , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  K. Nave,et al.  Neurod1 is essential for the survival and maturation of adult-born neurons , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[25]  J. Bechhoefer Feedback for physicists: A tutorial essay on control , 2005 .

[26]  H. Hamada,et al.  Interplay of SOX and POU Factors in Regulation of the Nestin Gene in Neural Primordial Cells , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  A. Sharov,et al.  Defining a Developmental Path to Neural Fate by Global Expression Profiling of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells and Adult Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells , 2006, Stem cells.

[28]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Integration of External Signaling Pathways with the Core Transcriptional Network in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[29]  Uri Alon,et al.  Proteome Half-Life Dynamics in Living Human Cells , 2011, Science.

[30]  Gene W. Yeo,et al.  Wnt-mediated activation of NeuroD1 and retro-elements during adult neurogenesis , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  P. Parsons,et al.  Domains of Brn-2 that mediate homodimerization and interaction with general and melanocytic transcription factors. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[32]  Araceli M. Huerta,et al.  From specific gene regulation to genomic networks: a global analysis of transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli. , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[33]  R. Young,et al.  Stem Cells, the Molecular Circuitry of Pluripotency and Nuclear Reprogramming , 2008, Cell.

[34]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Noise Propagation and Signaling Sensitivity in Biological Networks: A Role for Positive Feedback , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[35]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  SOX2 Co-Occupies Distal Enhancer Elements with Distinct POU Factors in ESCs and NPCs to Specify Cell State , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[36]  M. Krasnow,et al.  Defining a mesenchymal progenitor niche at single-cell resolution , 2014, Science.

[37]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[38]  G Vriend,et al.  New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantation enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2. , 1998, Genes & development.

[39]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[40]  Matt Thomson,et al.  Correction: Environmental Statistics and Optimal Regulation , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  Hitoshi Niwa,et al.  How is pluripotency determined and maintained? , 2007, Development.

[42]  R. Zwanzig Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics , 2001, Physics Subject Headings (PhySH).

[43]  Pierre Vanderhaeghen,et al.  An intrinsic mechanism of corticogenesis from embryonic stem cells , 2008, Nature.

[44]  Graziano Martello,et al.  The nature of embryonic stem cells. , 2014, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[45]  Mikael Sigvardsson,et al.  Epigenetic chromatin states uniquely define the developmental plasticity of murine hematopoietic stem cells. , 2010, Blood.

[46]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  A Systems-Level Analysis of Perfect Adaptation in Yeast Osmoregulation , 2009, Cell.

[47]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  M. Murakami,et al.  The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells , 2003, Cell.

[49]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[50]  A. Feinberg,et al.  Regulated Noise in the Epigenetic Landscape of Development and Disease , 2012, Cell.

[51]  Konstantinos Michalodimitrakis,et al.  Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[52]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[53]  M. L. Simpson,et al.  Frequency domain analysis of noise in autoregulated gene circuits , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  M Wilmanns,et al.  Differential dimer activities of the transcription factor Oct-1 by DNA-induced interface swapping. , 2001, Molecular cell.