Offline Optimization of the Relative Timing of Movements in a Sequence Is Blocked by Retroactive Behavioral Interference

Acquisition of motor skills often involves the concatenation of single movements into sequences. Along the course of learning, sequential performance becomes progressively faster and smoother, presumably by optimization of both motor planning and motor execution. Following its encoding during training, “how-to” memory undergoes consolidation, reflecting transformations in performance and its neurobiological underpinnings over time. This offline post-training memory process is characterized by two phenomena: reduced sensitivity to interference and the emergence of delayed, typically overnight, gains in performance. Here, using a training protocol that effectively induces motor sequence memory consolidation, we tested temporal and kinematic parameters of performance within (online) and between (offline) sessions, and their sensitivity to retroactive interference. One group learned a given finger-to-thumb opposition sequence (FOS), and showed robust delayed (consolidation) gains in the number of correct sequences performed at 24 h. A second group learned an additional (interference) FOS shortly after the first and did not show delayed gains. Reduction of touch times and inter-movement intervals significantly contributed to the overall offline improvement of performance overnight. However, only the offline inter-movement interval shortening was selectively blocked by the interference experience. Velocity and amplitude, comprising movement time, also significantly changed across the consolidation period but were interference –insensitive. Moreover, they paradoxically canceled out each other. Current results suggest that shifts in the representation of the trained sequence are subserved by multiple processes: from distinct changes in kinematic characteristics of individual finger movements to high-level, temporal reorganization of the movements as a unit. Each of these processes has a distinct time course and a specific susceptibility to retroactive interference. This multiple-component view may bridge the gap in understanding the link between the behavioral changes, which define online and offline learning, and the biological mechanisms that support those changes.

[1]  T. Flash,et al.  Trajectory of the index finger during grasping , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  P. Peigneux,et al.  Methods for studying unconscious learning. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[3]  J. Doyon,et al.  Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  Jason Friedman,et al.  Kinematic Strategies Underlying Improvement in the Acquisition of a Sequential Finger Task with Self-Generated vs. Cued Repetition Training , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Susanne Diekelmann,et al.  The Role of Sleep in Motor Sequence Consolidation: Stabilization Rather Than Enhancement , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Sleep and the time course of motor skill learning. , 2003, Learning & memory.

[10]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Practice with Sleep Makes Perfect Sleep-Dependent Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neuron.

[11]  J. Mann.  Control strategies. , 1987, AIDS action.

[12]  W. Gan,et al.  Sleep promotes branch-specific formation of dendritic spines after learning , 2014, Science.

[13]  Raju S. Bapi,et al.  Chunking Patterns Reflect Effector-dependent Representation of Motor Sequence , 2006 .

[14]  Edwin M Robertson,et al.  New Insights in Human Memory Interference and Consolidation , 2012, Current Biology.

[15]  R. Mukamel,et al.  Activity in superior parietal cortex during training by observation predicts asymmetric learning levels across hands , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[16]  J. Krakauer,et al.  How is a motor skill learned? Change and invariance at the levels of task success and trajectory control. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Multiple shifts in the representation of a motor sequence during the acquisition of skilled performance , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  F. Ballarini,et al.  Behavioral Tagging: A Translation of the Synaptic Tagging and Capture Hypothesis , 2015, Neural plasticity.

[19]  J. Ashe,et al.  Intelligence in action , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Nir Giladi,et al.  Interference to consolidation phase gains in learning a novel movement sequence by handwriting: dependence on laterality and the level of experience with the written sequence , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  S. Keele,et al.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. , 2003, Psychological review.

[22]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[23]  Y. Adini,et al.  The time course and characteristics of procedural learning in schizophrenia patients and healthy individuals , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  William B Verwey,et al.  Evidence for Lasting Sequence Segmentation in the Discrete Sequence-Production Task , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  Avi Karni,et al.  Sex differences in motor performance and motor learning in children and adolescents: An increasing male advantage in motor learning and consolidation phase gains , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  J. Diedrichsen,et al.  Motor skill learning between selection and execution , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  A. Karni.  The acquisition of perceptual and motor skills: a memory system in the adult human cortex. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Contribution of night and day sleep vs. simple passage of time to the consolidation of motor sequence and visuomotor adaptation learning , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Nir Giladi,et al.  When practice does not make perfect: well-practiced handwriting interferes with the consolidation phase gains in learning a movement sequence , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre-SMA. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Y. Dudai.  The restless engram: consolidations never end. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[33]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  J. Born,et al.  Motor Memory Consolidation in Sleep Shapes More Effective Neuronal Representations , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[36]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Predicting transfer from training performance. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[37]  Willem B Verwey,et al.  Processing modes and parallel processors in producing familiar keying sequences , 2003, Psychological research.

[38]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Sequence Learning: Response Structure and Effector Transfer , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  P. Peigneux,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy associated with the expression of distinct movement kinematics in motor sequence learning , 2011, Neuroscience.

[41]  T. Flash,et al.  When practice leads to co-articulation: the evolution of geometrically defined movement primitives , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Kinematics and Dynamics Are Not Represented Independently in Motor Working Memory: Evidence from an Interference Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[44]  J. Doyon,et al.  Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[45]  Julien Doyon,et al.  Maintaining vs. enhancing motor sequence memories: Respective roles of striatal and hippocampal systems , 2015, NeuroImage.

[46]  A. Karni,et al.  Daytime sleep condenses the time course of motor memory consolidation , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Knut Drewing,et al.  The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping , 2002, Psychological research.

[48]  Avi Karni,et al.  Reduced Susceptibility to Interference in the Consolidation of Motor Memory before Adolescence , 2007, PloS one.

[49]  Julien Doyon,et al.  Cerebral Activity Associated with Transient Sleep-Facilitated Reduction in Motor Memory Vulnerability to Interference , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[50]  G. Tononi,et al.  Sleep and the Price of Plasticity: From Synaptic and Cellular Homeostasis to Memory Consolidation and Integration , 2014, Neuron.

[51]  A. Luft,et al.  Stages of motor skill learning , 2005, Molecular Neurobiology.

[52]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Central mechanisms of motor skill learning , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[53]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Aaron L. Wong,et al.  Explicit knowledge enhances motor vigor and performance: motivation versus practice in sequence tasks. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Benjamin A Clegg,et al.  Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task , 2005, Psychological research.

[57]  Fredrik Ullén,et al.  Transfer in Motor Sequence Learning: Effects of Practice Schedule and Sequence Context , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[58]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Awareness Modifies the Skill-Learning Benefits of Sleep , 2004, Current Biology.

[59]  Matthew P Walker,et al.  A refined model of sleep and the time course of memory formation. , 2005, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[60]  R. Miall,et al.  Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[61]  E. Robertson.  The Serial Reaction Time Task: Implicit Motor Skill Learning? , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[63]  M. Desseilles,et al.  Both the Hippocampus and Striatum Are Involved in Consolidation of Motor Sequence Memory , 2008, Neuron.

[64]  Karolina Janacsek,et al.  Predicting the future: from implicit learning to consolidation. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[65]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Learning of a sequential motor skill comprises explicit and implicit components that consolidate differently. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Overnight alchemy: sleep-dependent memory evolution , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[68]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Emergence of rhythm during motor learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  Christophe Phillips,et al.  Interaction between Hippocampal and Striatal Systems Predicts Subsequent Consolidation of Motor Sequence Memory , 2013, PloS one.

[70]  Avi Karni,et al.  The specificity of memory for a highly trained finger movement sequence: Change the ending, change all , 2010, Brain Research.

[71]  Ádám Takács,et al.  Motor sequence learning , 2018, Scholarpedia.

[72]  Miles C. Bowman,et al.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[73]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Human premotor areas parse sequences into their spatial and temporal features , 2014, eLife.

[74]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  M P A Page,et al.  A model linking immediate serial recall, the Hebb repetition effect and the learning of phonological word forms , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Coarticulation in Fluent Fingerspelling , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.