Goals for "Astro 101": Report on Workshops for Department Leaders

Roughly 10% of all U.S. college students take an introductory astronomy course while in college. The vast majority of these students are not science majors, and this course often represents the only college-level science these undergraduates will ever encounter. The challenges posed by these courses were recently discussed at two workshops for chairs and other department leaders from selected research universities. Here we report on a set of goals for such courses formulated by the participants, and list some strategies to help accomplish them. The Executive Summary (section [1]) provides a brief description of the workshops and a list of goals for “Astro 101” endorsed by all participants at the meetings. Section [2] is a longer report on the structure and organization of the meetings, and a detailed presentation of the set of goals and strategies developed there. It provides illustrative examples of how the goals might be met in an Astro 101 course. This section was prepared by two of the participants in the meetings, Bruce Partridge and George Greenstein, and reflects their views, not necessarily those of all participants.

[1]  Edward F. Redish Millikan Award Lecture ( 1998 ) : Building a Science of Teaching Physics , 1999 .

[2]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  Student expectations in introductory physics , 1998 .

[3]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[4]  E. Boyer From Scholarship Reconsidered to Scholarship Assessed , 1996 .

[5]  Peter Seldin,et al.  How Colleges Evaluate Professors. 1988 vs. 1983. , 1989 .

[6]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories , 1997 .

[7]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[8]  F Meehan,et al.  Shaping the future. , 1991, Nursing.

[9]  L. Shulman,et al.  THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING. , 1909, Science.

[10]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Teaching Physics: Figuring out What Works , 1999 .

[11]  R. Diamond,et al.  The Disciplines Speak: Rewarding the Scholarly, Professional, and Creative Work of Faculty. Forum on Faculty Roles & Rewards. , 1995 .

[12]  Michael W. Matier,et al.  Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions , 1994 .

[13]  A. Astin,et al.  Undergraduate science education: the impact of different college environments on the educational pip , 1992 .

[14]  P. W. Laws,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses , 1997 .

[15]  Board on Physics Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium , 2001 .

[16]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  The Role of Assessment in the Development of the College Introductory Astronomy Course , 2001 .

[17]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  New Models of Physics Instruction Based on Physics Education Research. , 2000 .

[18]  Laura J. Horn A Profile of American Eighth-Grade Mathematics and Science Instruction. National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Statistical Analysis Report. , 1992 .

[19]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[20]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[21]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Science Teaching and Development Of Thinking , 1994 .

[22]  Eric L. Dey,et al.  The American Freshman: Twenty-Five Year Trends, 1966-1990. , 1991 .

[23]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  Revitalizing Undergraduate Science: Why Some Things Work and Most Don't , 1992 .

[24]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[25]  R. Henke,et al.  Schools and Staffing in the United States: A Statistical Profile, 1993-94. , 1996 .