Use of ablation and ultrasonic aspiration at primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer

Objectives Ovarian cancer patients with miliary disease have the lowest rates of complete surgical resection and poorest survival. Adjunct surgical techniques may potentially increase rates of complete surgical resection. No studies have evaluated the use of these techniques in primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer patients with miliary disease. The aim of this study was to examine the use of adjunct surgical techniques during primary debulking surgery for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer with miliary disease. Methods Medical records of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages IIIC–IVB epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with miliary disease undergoing primary debulking surgery from January 2010 to December 2014 were reviewed. Adjunct surgical techniques were defined as ultrasonic surgical aspiration, argon enhanced electrocautery, thermal plasma energy, and traditional electrocautery ablation. Patients undergoing surgery with and without these devices were compared with respect to demographics, operative characteristics, postoperative complications, residual disease, progression free survival and overall survival. Results A total of 135 patients with miliary disease underwent primary debulking surgery, of which 30 (22.2%) patients used adjunct surgical techniques. The most common devices were ultrasonic surgical aspiration (40%) and argon enhanced electrocautery (36.7%). The most common sites of use were diaphragm (63.3%), pelvic peritoneum (30%), bowel mesentery (20%), and large bowel serosa (20%). There were no differences in age, stage, primary site, histology, operative time, surgical complexity, or postoperative complications for patients operated on with or without these devices. Volume of residual disease was similar (0.1–1 cm: 60% with adjunct techniques versus 68.6% without; complete surgical resection: 16.7% with adjunct techniques versus 13.3% without; p=0.67). For patients with ≤1 cm residual disease, median progression free survival (15 versus 15 months, p=0.65) and median overall survival (40 versus 55 months, p=0.38) were also similar. Conclusion Adjunct surgical techniques may be incorporated during primary debulking surgery for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with miliary disease; however, these do not improve the rate of optimal cytoreduction.

[1]  M. Adelson Cytoreduction of small intestine metastases using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator. , 1995, Journal of gynecologic surgery.

[2]  F. Montz,et al.  Ablation of metastatic ovarian carcinoma with the argon beam coagulator: pathologic analysis of tumor destruction. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[4]  E. Goode,et al.  Factors that influence survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: A complex relationship between molecular subtype, disease dissemination, and operability. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  N. Teng,et al.  Peritoneal implant elimination during cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: impact on survival. , 1993, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  S. Vitale,et al.  The role of cytoreductive surgery in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review , 2013, Updates in Surgery.

[7]  D. Seifer,et al.  Cytoreduction of ovarian cancer with the Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator. , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  D. Chi,et al.  A Comparison of Thermal Plasma Energy Versus Argon Beam Coagulator-Induced Intestinal Injury After Vaporization in a Porcine Model , 2016, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[9]  Thumuluru Kavitha Madhuri,et al.  Interval debulking surgery following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IVB ovarian cancer using neutral argon plasma (PlasmaJet™). , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  Martin Krapcho,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations) , 2012 .

[11]  F. Montz,et al.  Complete surgical cytoreduction of advanced ovarian carcinoma using the argon beam coagulator. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  A. Brand Ovarian Cancer Debulking Surgery: A Survey of Practice in Australia and New Zealand , 2010, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[13]  W. Cliby,et al.  Aggressive and complex surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: an economic analysis. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  F. Incropera,et al.  A plasma scalpel: comparison of tissue damage and wound healing with electrosurgical and steel scalpels. , 1976, Archives of surgery.

[15]  M. Zenker Argon plasma coagulation , 2008, GMS Krankenhaushygiene interdisziplinar.

[16]  W. Hodgson Ultrasonic surgery. , 1980, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[17]  M. Préfontaine,et al.  Cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer with the cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  A. Bats,et al.  Optimal surgical cytoreduction of the upper abdomen and the diaphragm for advanced ovarian cancer using PlasmaJet™ energy. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  K. Odunsi,et al.  Prognostic value of miliary versus non-miliary sub-staging in advanced ovarian cancer. , 2017, Gynecologic Oncology.

[20]  P. Neven,et al.  Use of PlasmaJet for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Ovarian Cancer , 2016, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[21]  P. V. van Dam,et al.  Ultraradical debulking of epithelial ovarian cancer with the ultrasonic surgical aspirator: a prospective randomized trial. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  E. Goode,et al.  Intraperitoneal disease dissemination patterns are associated with residual disease, extent of surgery, and molecular subtypes in advanced ovarian cancer. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  G. M. N. Boer,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of the PlasmaJet® Device in advanced stage ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review. , 2019 .

[24]  Evaluation of effectiveness of the PlasmaJet surgical device in the treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer (PlaComOv-study): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands , 2019, BMC Cancer.

[25]  F. Guyon,et al.  Primary debulking surgery of the upper abdomen and the diaphragm, with a plasma device surgery system, for advanced ovarian cancer. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  Jacobus Pfisterer,et al.  Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials , 2009, Cancer.

[27]  M. Renaud,et al.  Optimal cytoreduction with neutral argon plasma energy in selected patients with ovarian and primitive peritoneal cancer. , 2013, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.