A novel approach to a phantom based method for maximum depth of penetration measurement in diagnostic ultrasound: a preliminary study

In the present work a new approach for maximum depth of ultrasound signal visualization has been proposed by means of a tissue mimicking phantoms: the novel method is based on a threshold on the tangent applied to the mean depth profile that is drawn by averaging adjacent columns in the diagnostic image. It has been implemented and preliminary tested on three different diagnostic systems equipped with linear array probes under similar settings: results have been compared with the mean judgment of 5 observer and with output from another method, based on a threshold of the mean depth profile above the noise level, as suggested in literature. Even though a not negligible difference among some results is observed, due likely to the high electronic noise level displayed in the ultrasound image, the tangent method seems to agree with observer judgment and be more sensitive to echo signal than the other one, even at higher noise levels. Nevertheless other test are going to be performed in the next future for a more detailed characterization of the method.

[1]  A. Scorza,et al.  Performance tests of sonographic instruments for the measure of flow speed , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Imaging Systems and Techniques.

[2]  James O. Larimer,et al.  Display characterization by eye: contrast ratio and discrimination throughout the grayscale , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Daniele Piras,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Penetration Depth in Clinical Ultrasound Systems , 2007 .

[4]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[5]  Andrea Scorza A novel method for automatic evaluation of the effective dynamic range of medical ultrasound scanners , 2009 .

[6]  Tom Kimpe,et al.  Increasing the Number of Gray Shades in Medical Display Systems—How Much is Enough? , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[7]  Andrea Scorza,et al.  Calibration procedure for performance evaluation of clinical Pulsed Doppler Systems , 2012 .

[8]  T. Case,et al.  Ultrasound physics and instrumentation. , 1998, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[9]  P. S. Hiremath,et al.  Removal of Gaussian Noise in Despeckling Medical Ultrasound Images , 2012 .

[10]  D. L. Hykes,et al.  Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation , 1985 .

[11]  Alin Achim,et al.  Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  A. Kaur,et al.  SPECKLE NOISE REDUCTION BY USING WAVELETS , 2010 .

[13]  A Scorza,et al.  Comparative evaluation of ultrasound scanner accuracy in distance measurement. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[14]  J M Kofler,et al.  Improved method for determining resolution zones in ultrasound phantoms with spherical simulated lesions. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  K R Gorny,et al.  Implementation and validation of three automated methods for measuring ultrasound maximum depth of penetration: application to ultrasound quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[16]  J M Thijssen,et al.  Performance testing of medical echo/Doppler equipment. , 2002, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.