Students' perceptions of teacher behaviors as motivating and demotivating factors in college classes

This study coded and categorized 2404 motivators and demotivators freely listed by 308 college students prior to and following their being prompted to consider teacher behaviors as contributing to motivation level. Twenty categories of motivators and 20 categories of demotivators emerged; four of each reflected context factors, six of each structure/format factors, and ten of each teacher behavior factors. While teacher behaviors accounted for approximately 44% of both motivators and demotivators, negative teacher behaviors were perceived as more central to students' demotivation (i.e., were listed without prompting) than positive teacher behaviors were perceived as central to motivation. Structure/format factors were more frequently mentioned as demotivators and context factors, such as desire to know the material, grade or credit motivation, and personal desire for accomplishment, as motivators. It was concluded that motivation is perceived by students as a student‐owned state, while lack of motivation ...

[1]  E. S. Conklin.  Human Motivation , 1932, The Journal of Religion.

[2]  J. Brophy.  Synthesis of Research on Strategies for Motivating Students to Learn. , 1987 .

[3]  Wendy McColskey,et al.  Differential effects of norm-referenced and self-referenced feedback on performance expectancies, attributions, and motivation , 1985 .

[4]  J. Gorham,et al.  Effects of immediacy on recall of information , 1988 .

[5]  J. Gorham,et al.  A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product , 1990 .

[6]  Motivation and Teaching: A Practical Guide Raymond J. Wlodkowski. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1978, $8.50 , 1979 .

[7]  D. Schunk.  Self-Efficacy and Classroom Learning , 1985 .

[8]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[9]  Diane M. Christophel.  The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[10]  J. Gorham.  The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning , 1988 .

[11]  David Bernard Guralnik,et al.  Webster's New World dictionary of the American language , 1974 .

[12]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Power in the Classroom IV: Alternatives to Discipline , 1984 .

[13]  Patricia Kearney,et al.  An attributional analysis of college students' resistance decisions , 1991 .

[14]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[15]  J. Brophy,et al.  Conceptualizing student motivation , 1983 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[18]  Patricia Kearney,et al.  Effects of Teacher Immediacy and Strategy Type on College Student Resistance. , 1986 .

[19]  P. Kearney,et al.  College teacher misbehaviors: What students don't like about what teachers say and do , 1991 .

[20]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning , 1986 .

[21]  Frank A. Logan,et al.  Fundamentals of learning and motivation , 1970 .

[22]  J. F. Andersen.  Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness , 1979 .

[23]  P. Ashton,et al.  Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education , 1984 .

[24]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[25]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  Power in the Classroom III: Teacher Communication Techniques and Messages. , 1985 .

[26]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  The Relationship of Teachers' Use of Humor in the Classroom to Immediacy and Student Learning. , 1990 .