Cognition in Scientific and Everyday Domains: Comparison and Learning Implications.

An analysis and comparison of everyday life and the domain of science reveals significant differences in their goals and in the cognitive means used to attain these goals. Students' lack of awareness of these differences can lead to pervasive learning difficulties in their study of science. Thus many students (a) have erroneous conceptions of scientific goals, (b) import goals and ways of thinking which are effective in everyday life but inadequate in science, and (c) devise ways of thinking ill suited to science. Additional complications arise because science taught in schools often differs both from actual science and from everyday life. Students' learning difficulties are thus increased because scientific goals are distorted and scientific ways of thinking are inadequately taught. The preceding analysis suggests some empirical investigations and instructional improvements.

[1]  F. Reif.  Instructional design, cognition, and technology: Applications to the teaching of scientific concepts , 1987 .

[2]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .

[3]  M. Linn,et al.  How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? , 1991 .

[4]  B. Eylon,et al.  Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts , 1983 .

[5]  F. Jacob,et al.  The Statue Within: An Autobiography , 1988 .

[6]  F. Reif,et al.  Effects of Knowledge Organization on Task Performance , 1984 .

[7]  Gerald Holton,et al.  Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. , 1976 .

[8]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[9]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[10]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[11]  J. Hadamard,et al.  The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. , 1945 .

[12]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[13]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Development of explanation: Incremental and fundamental change in children's physics knowledge , 1991 .

[14]  R. Feynman.  The development of the space-time view of quantum electrodynamics. , 1966, Science.

[15]  A. Schoenfeld.  Beyond the Purely Cognitive: Belief Systems, Social Cognitions, and Metacognitions As Driving Forces in Intellectual Performance , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  Student understanding in mechanics: A large population survey , 1987 .

[17]  J. Larkin,et al.  Understanding and Teaching Problem‐Solving in Physics , 1979 .

[18]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[19]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Sources of Difficulty in Understanding Newtonian Dynamics , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  L. Viennot.  Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. , 1979 .

[21]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Ideas and Opinions , 1954 .

[22]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension , 1980 .

[23]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[24]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Interpretation of scientific or mathematical concepts: Cognitive issues and instructional implications ** , 1987 .

[25]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Prescribing Effective Human Problem-Solving Processes: Problem Description in Physics. Working Paper ES-19. , 1984 .

[26]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[27]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Cognition of learning physics , 1981 .

[28]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects , 1981, Cognition.

[29]  Chandler Stolp,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1983 .

[30]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Unlearning Aristotelian Physics: A Study of Knowledge-Based Learning , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[32]  J. Clement.  Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[33]  L. McDermott.  Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics , 1984 .

[34]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics. Proceedings of the International Seminar. (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA, June 20-22, 1983). , 1983 .

[35]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one dimension , 1981 .

[36]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[38]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[39]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Common sense concepts about motion , 1985 .

[40]  F. Reif,et al.  Facilitation of Scientific Concept Learning by Interpretation Procedures and Diagnosis , 1988 .