Comparing State-Space Multivariable Controls to Multi-SISO Controls for Load Reduction of Drivetrain-Coupled Modes on Wind Turbines through Field-Testing

In this paper we present results from an ongoing controller comparison study at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) National Wind Technology Center (NWTC). The intention of the study is to demonstrate the advantage of using modern multivariable methods for designing control systems for wind turbines versus conventional approaches. We will demonstrate the advantages through field-test results from experimental turbines located at the NWTC. At least two controllers are being developed side-by-side to meet an incrementally increasing number of turbine load-reduction objectives. The first, a multiple single-input, single-output (m-SISO) approach, uses separately developed decoupled and classicially tuned controllers, which is, to the best of our knowledge, common practice in the wind industry. The remaining controllers are developed using state-space multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) techniques to explicity account for coupling between loops and to optimize given known frequency structures of the turbine and disturbance. In this first publication from the study, we present the structure of the ongoing controller comparison experiment, the design process for the two controllers compared in this phase, and initial comparison results obtained in field-testing.

[1]  Alan Wright,et al.  Controller Field Tests on the NREL CART2 Turbine , 2010 .

[2]  Karl Stol,et al.  A Study of Dynamic Coupling and Composite Load Control for Wind Turbines , 2010 .

[3]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Turbine Control for Load Reduction , 2003 .

[4]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  Two-Degree-of-Freedom Active Vibration Control of a Prototyped “Smart” Rotor , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[5]  Poul Ejnar Sørensen,et al.  Control design for a pitch-regulated, variable speed wind turbine , 2005 .

[6]  K. A. Stol,et al.  Wind Turbine Field Testing of State-Space Control Designs: August 25, 2003--November 30, 2003 , 2004 .

[7]  Palle Andersen,et al.  Comparing PI and Robust Pitch Controllers on a 400kw Wind Turbine by full scale Tests , 1997 .

[8]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[9]  Paul Fleming,et al.  Resonant Vibrations Resulting from the Re-Engineering of a Constant-Speed 2-Bladed Turbine to a Variable-Speed 3-Bladed Turbine , 2010 .

[10]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[11]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  The Design of closed loop controllers for wind turbines , 2000 .

[12]  Alan Wright,et al.  Further Progress with Field Testing of Individual Pitch Control , 2010 .

[13]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook , 2001 .

[14]  Paul Fleming,et al.  Refinements and Tests of an Advanced Controller to Mitigate Fatigue Loads in the Controls Advanced Research Turbine , 2011 .

[15]  Karl Stol,et al.  Field Testing Controls to Mitigate Fatigue Loads in the Controls Advanced Research Turbine , 2009 .