Trajectories in Multiple Group Coordination: A Field Study of Hospital Operating Suites

Hospital surgery environments are dynamic and high risk. They require coordination across multiple groups whose incentives, cultures, and routines can conflict. In this paper, we describe a field study of multi-group coordination in the operating room (OR) environment. We studied work trajectories from the perspective of each group involved. Coordination breakdowns at group boundaries involving patients, doctors, nurses, and other staff led to local problem solving, but also to delays and interpersonal tension and conflict across groups. We conclude with design recommendations for multiple group coordination support that would promote trajectory awareness and learning at the organizational level

[1]  Colin F. Mackenzie,et al.  Collaborative Management of Complex Coordination Systems: Operating Room Schedule Coordination , 2003 .

[2]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research , 1999, CoBuild.

[3]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Team performance in the operating room. , 1994 .

[4]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  NetWORKers and their Activity in Intensional Networks , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[5]  S. Sharfstein.  Social Organization of Medical Work , 1986 .

[6]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[7]  Gillian Symon,et al.  The coordination of work activities: Cooperation and conflict in a hospital context , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[9]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Applications of context-aware computing in hospital work: examples and design principles , 2004, SAC '04.

[10]  R. W. Root,et al.  Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology , 1990 .

[11]  Marilyn Sue Bogner,et al.  Human Error in Medicine , 1995 .

[12]  Matthew B. Weinger,et al.  Ergonomic and Human Factors Affecting Anesthetic Vigilance and Monitoring Performance in the Operating Room Environment , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[13]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work , 2002, CSCW '02.

[14]  Datong Chen,et al.  A Study of Detecting Social Interaction with Sensors in a Nursing Home Environment , 2005, ICCV-HCI.

[15]  D. Norman,et al.  Psychological Issues in Support of Multiple Activities , 1986 .

[16]  D M Gaba,et al.  Measuring the Workload of the Anesthesiologist , 1990, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  Henry C. Chueh,et al.  eWhiteBoard: A Real Time Clinical Scheduler , 1999, AMIA.

[18]  Owen Daly-Jones,et al.  Informal workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it? , 1994, CHI '94.

[19]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  “I love the system—I just don't use it!” , 1997, GROUP.

[20]  Yan Xiao,et al.  A comparison of communication needs of charge nurses in two operating room suites , 2002, AMIA.

[21]  Christian Heath,et al.  Collaboration and controlCrisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[22]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Temporal Coordination –On Time and Coordination of CollaborativeActivities at a Surgical Department , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[23]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[24]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Work coordination, workflow, and workarounds in a medical context , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[25]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Large public display boards: a case study of an OR board and design implications , 2001, AMIA.

[26]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[27]  A. Strauss.  Social Organization of Medical Work , 1985 .