Effects of the atmospheric channel on free-space laser communications

In this paper we provide an overview of how the presence of atmospheric turbulence and scattering/absorbing media in the atmospheric channel degrade high-data-rate free-space laser communication performance. The impact of the atmospheric channel on overall link budget performance is discussed. Fog, rain, dust, snow, smoke, molecular absorption, and aerosol particulate matter all attenuate the signal-carrying laser beam, and to a certain extent can be compensated for by increasing the signal gain or by appropriate selection of the optical wavelength. In contrast, random fluctuations in the atmospheres refractive index severely degrade the wave-front quality of a signal-carrying laser beam, causing intensity fading and random signal losses at the receiver. This results in increased system bit error rates, especially along horizontal propagation paths. Atmospheric turbulence-induced signal losses increase as the distance between the transmitter and receiver is increased, and there is no wavelength window where these effects can be avoided, although longer wavelengths are less affected. With atmospheric turbulence, increasing the signal gain will not necessarily improve laser beam quality. For many cases of practical interest, the limiting factor in robust free-space optical communication link performance can be the presence of clear-air atmospheric turbulence in the optical channel. Various proposed probability density functions of laser intensity fluctuations through atmospheric turbulence will be discussed as they relate to laser communications performance and reliability under different weather conditions. Results from numerical simulations are presented for analyzing communications performance for various scenarios: Downlink, Uplink and Terrestrial (Horizontal) link.

[1]  Arun K. Majumdar,et al.  Free-space laser communication performance in the atmospheric channel , 2005 .

[2]  Mikhail A. Vorontsov,et al.  Free-space laser communications with adaptive optics: Atmospheric compensation experiments , 2004 .

[3]  L C Andrews,et al.  Experimental verification and theory for an eight-element multiple-aperture equal-gain coherent laser receiver for laser communications. , 1998, Applied optics.

[4]  Jennifer C. Ricklin,et al.  Estimating optical turbulence effects on free-space laser communication: modeling and measurements at ARL's A_LOT facility , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[5]  M. Miller,et al.  Turbulence environment characterization , 1977 .

[6]  J. Hardy,et al.  Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes , 1998 .

[7]  J. Ricklin,et al.  Atmospheric optical communication with a Gaussian Schell beam. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Darryl P. Greenwood,et al.  Bandwidth specification for adaptive optics systems , 1977 .

[9]  Jennifer C. Ricklin,et al.  Atmospheric channel effects on free-space laser communication , 2006 .

[10]  V. L. Mironov Propagation of a laser beam in a turbulent atmosphere , 1981 .

[11]  Douglas E. Canning,et al.  Indirect measurement of a laser communications bit-error-rate reduction with low-order adaptive optics. , 2003, Applied optics.

[12]  Hamid Hemmati,et al.  Wavelength selection criteria for laser communications , 1995, Photonics West.

[13]  H. Yura,et al.  Optical scintillation statistics for IR ground-to-space laser communication systems. , 1983, Applied optics.

[14]  Isaac I. Kim,et al.  Scintillation reduction using multiple transmitters , 1997, Photonics West.