A General Model for Binary Cell Fate Decision Gene Circuits with Degeneracy: Indeterminacy and Switch Behavior in the Absence of Cooperativity
暂无分享,去创建一个
Julianne D. Halley | Mircea Andrecut | M. Andrecut | Sui Huang | J. D. Halley | D. Winkler | Sui Huang | David A. Winkler
[1] F. Burden,et al. Stem cell decision making and critical-like exploratory networks. , 2009, Stem cell research.
[2] John D. Sterman,et al. System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .
[3] Avi Ma’ayan,et al. Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[4] Sui Huang,et al. The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.
[5] D. Tenen,et al. PU.1 (Spi-1) autoregulates its expression in myeloid cells. , 1995, Oncogene.
[6] Ingo Roeder,et al. Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.
[7] Janet Rossant,et al. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 Determines Trophectoderm Differentiation , 2005, Cell.
[8] C. Lim,et al. Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.
[9] J. Collins,et al. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.
[10] M. Diederich,et al. GATA‐1: Friends, Brothers, and Coworkers , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[11] Sui Huang. Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[12] D. R. Wilson,et al. Autoregulation of the human C/EBP alpha gene by stimulation of upstream stimulatory factor binding , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.
[13] M. Savageau. Michaelis-Menten mechanism reconsidered: implications of fractal kinetics. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.
[14] J. Monod,et al. Teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth, and differentiation. , 1961, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.
[15] N. Rekhtman,et al. Direct interaction of hematopoietic transcription factors PU.1 and GATA-1: functional antagonism in erythroid cells. , 1999, Genes & development.
[16] Carsten Peterson,et al. Computational Modeling of the Hematopoietic Erythroid-Myeloid Switch Reveals Insights into Cooperativity, Priming, and Irreversibility , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[17] S. Kauffman,et al. Mean-field model of genetic regulatory networks , 2006, q-bio/0606022.
[18] D. Amanatullah,et al. PU.1 inhibits the erythroid program by binding to GATA‐1 on DNA and creating a repressive chromatin structure , 2005, The EMBO journal.
[19] Sui Huang,et al. Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.
[20] Janet Rossant,et al. Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse , 2009, Development.
[21] Sui Huang,et al. Cell Lineage Determination in State Space: A Systems View Brings Flexibility to Dogmatic Canonical Rules , 2010, PLoS biology.
[22] B. Frey,et al. The functional landscape of mouse gene expression , 2004, Journal of biology.
[23] Pavol Bokes,et al. A bistable genetic switch which does not require high co-operativity at the promoter: a two-timescale model for the PU.1-GATA-1 interaction. , 2009, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.
[24] J. Rossant. Stem cells and lineage development in the mammalian blastocyst. , 2007, Reproduction, fertility, and development.
[25] S. Batalov,et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] J Swanson,et al. Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[27] T. Graf,et al. Heterogeneity of embryonic and adult stem cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.
[28] G. Blobel,et al. Inhibition of CBP-Mediated Protein Acetylation by the Ets Family Oncoprotein PU.1 , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[29] Hannah H. Chang,et al. Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.
[30] Mikael Huss,et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. , 2010, Developmental cell.
[31] S A Kauffman,et al. Monte Carlo simulation of a simple gene network yields new evolutionary insights. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.
[32] T. Enver,et al. Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.
[33] B. Doble,et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.
[34] D. Tenen,et al. Downregulation of c-Jun Expression by Transcription Factor C/EBPα Is Critical for Granulocytic Lineage Commitment , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[35] N. Rekhtman,et al. PU.1 and pRB Interact and Cooperate To Repress GATA-1 and Block Erythroid Differentiation , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[36] Carsten Peterson,et al. A Computational Model for Understanding Stem Cell, Trophectoderm and Endoderm Lineage Determination , 2008, PloS one.
[37] Alexei A. Sharov,et al. Functional Heterogeneity of Embryonic Stem Cells Revealed through Translational Amplification of an Early Endodermal Transcript , 2010, PLoS biology.
[38] Takashi Hiiragi,et al. Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.
[39] Chi-Wei Lu,et al. Cross-regulation of the Nanog and Cdx2 promoters , 2009, Cell Research.
[40] G. Daley,et al. Another horse in the meta-stable state of pluripotency. , 2010, Cell stem cell.
[41] G. Nicolis,et al. Dissipative systems , 1986 .
[42] Sui Huang,et al. Complex Gene Regulatory Networks - from Structure to Biological Observables: Cell Fate Determination , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.
[43] M. Ehrenberg,et al. Stochastic focusing: fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] Kim Sneppen,et al. Physics in molecular biology , 2005 .
[45] C. Peterson,et al. Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. , 2009, Cell stem cell.
[46] S. Orkin,et al. PU.1 inhibits GATA-1 function and erythroid differentiation by blocking GATA-1 DNA binding. , 2000, Blood.
[47] Peter Angel,et al. The jun proto-oncogene is positively autoregulated by its product, Jun/AP-1 , 1988, Cell.
[48] Merlin Crossley,et al. Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[49] Ofer Biham,et al. Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding. , 2006, Physical review letters.
[50] D. Tenen,et al. Granulocyte inducer C/EBPalpha inactivates the myeloid master regulator PU.1: possible role in lineage commitment decisions. , 2002, Blood.
[51] A. Martinez Arias,et al. Wnt/Notch signalling and information processing during development , 2008, Development.
[52] Jacques Demongeot,et al. High-dimensional Switches and the Modeling of Cellular Differentiation 2.2 Mathematical Models , 2022 .
[53] Carsten Peterson,et al. Transcriptional Dynamics of the Embryonic Stem Cell Switch , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[54] Sui Huang,et al. Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[55] D. Tenen,et al. Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.