Social Cues Modulate Cognitive Status of Discourse Referents
暂无分享,去创建一个
Juhani Järvikivi | Kara Hawthorne | Emily Sullivan | Anja Arnhold | Juhani Järvikivi | Anja Arnhold | K. Hawthorne | Emily Sullivan
[1] Agnieszka E. Konopka,et al. Planning Ahead: How Recent Experience with Structures and Words Changes the Scope of Linguistic Planning. , 2009 .
[2] P. Hagoort,et al. Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[3] A. Kingstone,et al. The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .
[4] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. Who is respectful? Effects of social context and individual empathic ability on ambiguity resolution during utterance comprehension , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[5] Juhani Järvikivi,et al. Activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. , 2010, Experimental psychology.
[6] Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al. Knowing ‘who she is’ based on ‘where she is’: The effect of co-speech gesture on pronoun comprehension , 2012, Language and Cognition.
[7] Juhani Järvikivi,et al. Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution , 2005, Psychological science.
[8] Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al. The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.
[9] Jeanette K. Gundel,et al. Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .
[10] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. Effects of psychological attention on pronoun comprehension , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[11] J. V. Berkum,et al. On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking , 2006 .
[12] M. Crocker,et al. Investigating joint attention mechanisms through spoken human–robot interaction , 2011, Cognition.
[13] Zenzi M. Griffin,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .
[14] Per B. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .
[15] C. Goodwin. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers , 1981 .
[16] J. Trueswell,et al. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution , 2008 .
[17] Saveria Colonna,et al. Information structure cues for 4-year-olds and adults: tracking eye movements to visually presented anaphoric referents , 2014 .
[18] M. Argyle,et al. Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.
[19] M. Gernsbacher,et al. Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.
[20] V. Bruce,et al. Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[21] Jennifer E. Arnold,et al. The road to understanding is paved with the speaker’s intentions: Cues to the speaker’s attention and intentions affect pronoun comprehension , 2014, Cognitive Psychology.
[22] S. Brennan,et al. Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation , 2007 .
[23] R J Stevenson,et al. The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns , 1990, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[24] Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al. Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1996 .
[25] Barbara J. Grosz,et al. Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..
[26] W. Levelt,et al. Eye movements during the production of nouns and pronouns , 2001, Memory & cognition.