Spinning Icons: Introducing a Novel SSVEP-BCI Paradigm Based on Rotation

Steady-State-Visually-Evoked-Potential (SSVEP) Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) make use of flickering stimuli to determine the target a user is looking at and select commands accordingly. Those types of BCI can be operated with little to no training, achieve high classification accuracies and are robust in application. A drawback of this approach is the reduced user comfort due to the constant flickering of the stimuli which can be annoying and tiring to look at. Existing studies addressing this issue try to make use of motion to disguise the oscillating patterns. However, this makes them look abstract and restricts the design of those applications as those patterns do not blend in to conventional user interfaces. In this work we introduce the concept of spinning icons to evoke SSVEPs. The icons are rotating in a certain frequency around their vertical axis and are supposed to appear more natural and be less stressing for the human eye. Furthermore this concept is not bound to any kind of abstract motion based pattern but rather supposed to work with any type of icon or image. The newly designed stimuli were evaluated in an application-oriented scenario and compared to standard and state-of-the-art movement-based SSVEP stimuli regarding the classification accuracy and experienced visual fatigue. The results show that the newly created stimuli performed equally well and partially even better in terms of classification accuracy and were rated throughout better concerning visual fatigue by the study participants. This work therefore lays the foundation for more comfortable SSVEP-BCIs which can be used with basically every icon or UI element spinning around their vertical axis.

[1]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  SSVEP recognition using common feature analysis in brain–computer interface , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Yodchanan Wongsawat,et al.  Motion visual stimulus for SSVEP-based BCI system , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Dean J. Krusienski,et al.  Optimization of Checkerboard Spatial Frequencies for Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  D. Regan Steady-state evoked potentials. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  Feng Wan,et al.  An online SSVEP-based chatting system , 2011, Proceedings 2011 International Conference on System Science and Engineering.

[6]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential (SSMVEP) Based on Equal Luminance Colored Enhancement , 2017, PloS one.

[7]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Optimising non-invasive brain-computer interface systems for free communication between naïve human participants , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Gérard Dreyfus,et al.  Transient brain activity explains the spectral content of steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  John R. Smith,et al.  Steady-State VEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface Control in an Immersive 3D Gaming Environment , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[10]  Sung Chan Jun,et al.  A Step-by-Step Tutorial for a Motor Imagery–Based BCI , 2018 .

[11]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[12]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Control of an Electrical Prosthesis With an SSVEP-Based BCI , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Four Novel Motion Paradigms Based on Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[15]  Xiaogang Chen,et al.  Filter bank canonical correlation analysis for implementing a high-speed SSVEP-based brain–computer interface , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Francesco Piccione,et al.  User adaptive BCIs: SSVEP and P300 based interfaces , 2003, PsychNology J..

[17]  Vangelis Sakkalis,et al.  Visual fatigue effects on Steady State Visual Evoked Potential-based Brain Computer Interfaces , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[18]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Effects of Mental Load and Fatigue on Steady-State Evoked Potential Based Brain Computer Interface Tasks: A Comparison of Periodic Flickering and Motion-Reversal Based Visual Attention , 2016, PloS one.

[19]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Comparison of DFT and lock-in amplifier features and search for optimal electrode positions in SSVEP-based BCI , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Sanjay E. Sarma,et al.  Sublime: a hands-free virtual reality menu navigation system using a high-frequency SSVEP-based brain-computer interface , 2018, VRST.

[21]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Highly Interactive Brain–Computer Interface Based on Flicker-Free Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Dezhong Yao,et al.  Stimulator selection in SSVEP-based BCI. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.