Extrinsic value orientation and "the tragedy of the commons".

Two studies examined the effect of Extrinsic Value Orientation (Kasser & Ryan, 1993, 1996) upon harvesting strategies and personal profit within commons dilemmas, in which individual and group interests can be at odds. At an individual or within-group level of analysis, extrinsically oriented persons (who value money, fame, and popularity) harvested more than intrinsically oriented persons (who value self-acceptance, intimacy, and community). However, a counteracting group-level effect was found such that groups with a greater number of extrinsic members harvested less on average than did groups with more intrinsic members, because their commons did not last as long. As a result, even excessive harvesters within extrinsic groups did no better than did self-restrained harvesters within intrinsic groups. Supplementary analyses indicate that extrinsic values are associated with acquisitiveness regarding resources, more so than apprehension regarding others' acquisitiveness.

[1]  E. Deci,et al.  The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality , 1985 .

[2]  David M. Messick,et al.  Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis , 1986 .

[3]  R. Lewontin ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[4]  R. Ryan,et al.  The relations of maternal and social environments to late adolescents' materialistic and prosocial values. , 1995 .

[5]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Expectations of choice behavior held by cooperators, competitors, and individualists across four classes of experimental games. , 1976 .

[6]  L. A. Pervin Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[7]  David M. Messick,et al.  Effects of experience on performance in a replenishable resource trap. , 1985 .

[8]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  D. McAdams Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons , 1996 .

[10]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[11]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[12]  M. Brewer,et al.  Hierarchical Evolutionary Theory: There Is an Alternative, and It's Not Creationism , 1995 .

[13]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  E. Sober,et al.  Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences , 1994 .

[15]  M. Poppe,et al.  Effects of greed and fear of being gypped in a social dilemma situation with changing pool size , 1986 .

[16]  D. Raphael,et al.  I: The Theory of Moral Sentiments , 1976 .

[17]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game , 1984 .

[18]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Why do People Sacrifice for Their Nations , 1995 .

[19]  P. D. Preez The Evolution of Altruism: A Brief Comment on Stern's "Why Do People Sacrifice for Their Nations?" , 1996 .

[20]  M. Clark,et al.  Some Detrimental Effects of Negative Mood on Individuals' Ability to Solve Resource Dilemmas , 1991 .

[21]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  A Collective Fear of the Collective: Implications for Selves and Theories of Selves , 1994 .

[22]  R. Bosker Boekbespreking van "A.S. Bryk & S.W. Raudenbusch - Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods" : Sage Publications, Newbury Parki, London/New Delhi 1992 , 1995 .

[23]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[24]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[25]  C. Parks,et al.  The Predictive Ability of Social Values in Resource Dilemmas and Public Goods Games , 1994 .

[26]  I. Mysterud Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior , 1999 .

[27]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  M. Patchen,et al.  Strategies for Eliciting Cooperation from an Adversary , 1987 .

[29]  H. Wilke,et al.  ABOUT THE SALIENCY OF FEAR AND GREED IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS , 1989 .

[30]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Pursuing Personal Goals: Skills Enable Progress, but Not all Progress is Beneficial , 1998 .

[31]  R. Ryan,et al.  Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. , 1995, Journal of personality.

[32]  T. M. Amabile,et al.  The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  John Orbell,et al.  Cooperation for the benefit of us—Not me, or my conscience. , 1990 .

[34]  J. Drever,et al.  Foundations for a Science of Personality , 1942, Nature.

[35]  Melvin J. Kimmel,et al.  Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique,Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future , 1977 .

[36]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[37]  John Orbell,et al.  Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. , 1989 .

[38]  D. Magnusson,et al.  Personality at the crossroads : current issues in interactional psychology , 1977 .

[39]  David M. Messick,et al.  Framing and communication effects on group members''responses to environmental and social uncertaint , 1993 .

[40]  E. Higgins Personality, social psychology, and person-situation relations: Standards and knowledge activation as a common language. , 1990 .

[41]  A RAPOPORT,et al.  Experimental games: a review. , 2007 .

[42]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[43]  E. Deci,et al.  A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. , 1990, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[44]  J. Edney,et al.  The commons problem: Alternative perspectives. , 1980 .

[45]  David C. McClelland,et al.  How Do Self-Attributed and Implicit Motives Differ?. , 1989 .

[46]  D. Funder,et al.  Profiting from controversy. Lessons from the person-situation debate. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[47]  S. Komorita,et al.  Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction , 1995 .

[48]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  What Makes for a Good Day? Competence and Autonomy in the Day and in the Person , 1996 .

[49]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[50]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[51]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might Versus Morality Effect , 1994 .

[52]  R. Ryan,et al.  A dark side of the American dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[54]  Michael A. Becker Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[55]  R. Ryan,et al.  Further Examining the American Dream: Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals , 1996 .

[56]  A. Maslow Motivation and personality, 3rd ed. , 1987 .

[57]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[58]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.