Comparison of feature-level and kernel-level data fusion methods in multi-sensory fall detection

In this work, we studied the problem of fall detection using signals from tri-axial wearable sensors. In particular, we focused on the comparison of methods to combine signals from multiple tri-axial accelerometers which were attached to different body parts in order to recognize human activities. To improve the detection rate while maintaining a low false alarm rate, previous studies developed detection algorithms by cascading base algorithms and experimented on each sensory data separately. Rather than combining base algorithms, we explored the combination of multiple data sources. Based on the hypothesis that these sensor signals should provide complementary information to the characterization of human's physical activities, we benchmarked a feature level and a kernel-level fusions to learn the kernel that incorporates multiple sensors in the support vector classifier. The results show that given the same false alarm rate constraint, the detection rate improves when using signals from multiple sensors, compared to the baseline where no fusion was employed.

[1]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Controlling the Sensitivity of Support Vector Machines , 1999 .

[2]  Wen-Chang Cheng,et al.  Triaxial Accelerometer-Based Fall Detection Method Using a Self-Constructing Cascade-AdaBoost-SVM Classifier , 2013, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[3]  L. Gonzo,et al.  A hardware-software framework for high-reliability people fall detection , 2008, 2008 IEEE Sensors.

[4]  Ivor W. Tsang,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS 1 Soft Margin Multiple Kernel Learning , 2022 .

[5]  Amy Loutfi,et al.  Challenges and Issues in Multisensor Fusion Approach for Fall Detection: Review Paper , 2016, J. Sensors.

[6]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[7]  Alexander Zien,et al.  lp-Norm Multiple Kernel Learning , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Learning the Kernel Matrix with Semidefinite Programming , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Florentino Fernández Riverola,et al.  A Ubiquitous and Low-Cost Solution for Movement Monitoring and Accident Detection Based on Sensor Fusion , 2014, Sensors.

[10]  Massimiliano Marcellino,et al.  A Survey of Econometric Methods for Mixed-Frequency Data , 2013 .

[11]  Yves Grandvalet,et al.  Y.: SimpleMKL , 2008 .

[12]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  Large Scale Multiple Kernel Learning , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Geometry from a Time Series , 1980 .

[14]  Zenglin Xu,et al.  An Extended Level Method for Efficient Multiple Kernel Learning , 2008, NIPS.

[15]  Matjaz Gams,et al.  An Agent-Based Approach to Care in Independent Living , 2010, AmI.

[16]  Matjaz Gams,et al.  Accelerometer Placement for Posture Recognition and Fall Detection , 2011, 2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Environments.

[17]  Surapa Thiemjarus,et al.  Automatic Fall Monitoring: A Review , 2014, Sensors.

[18]  Qiang Li,et al.  Grammar-based, posture- and context-cognitive detection for falls with different activity levels , 2011, Wireless Health.

[19]  Cheng Soon Ong,et al.  Multiclass multiple kernel learning , 2007, ICML '07.

[20]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm , 2004, ICML.

[21]  Mehryar Mohri,et al.  L2 Regularization for Learning Kernels , 2009, UAI.