The modified zeo-SBR is recommended for a new nitrogen removal process that has a special function of consistent ammonium exchange and bioregeneration of zeolite-floc. Three sets of sequencing batch reactors, control, zeo-SBR, and modified zeo-SBR were tested to assess nitrogen removal efficiency. The control reactor consisted of anoxic-fill, aeration-mixing, settling, and decanting/idle phases, meaning that nitrogen removal efficiency was dependent on the decanting volume in a cycle. The zeo-SBR reactor was operated in the same way as the control reactor, except for daily addition of powdered zeolite in the SBR reactor. The operating order sequences in the zeo-SBR were changed in the modified zeo-SBR. Anoxic-fill phase was followed by aeration-mixing phase in the zeo-SBR, while aeration-mixing phase was followed by anoxic-fill phase in the modified zeo-SBR to carry NH4(+)-N over to the next operational cycle and to reduce total nitrogen concentration in the effluent. In the modified zeo-SBR, nitrification and biological regeneration occurred during the initial aeration-mixing phase, while denitrification and ammonium adsorption occurred in the following anoxic-fill phase. The changed operational sequence in the modified zeo-SBR to adapt the ammonium adsorption and biological regeneration of the zeolite-floc could enhance nitrogen removal efficiency. As a result of the continuous operation, the nitrogen removal efficiencies of the control and zeo-SBR were in 68.5-70.9%, based on the 33% of decanting volume for a cycle. The zeo-SBR showed a consistent ammonium exchange and bio-regeneration in the anoxic-fill and aeration-mixing phases, respectively. Meanwhile, the effluent total nitrogen of the modified zeo-SBR showed 50-60 mg N/L through ammonium adsorption of the zeolite-floc when the influent ammonium concentration was 315 mg N/L, indicating the T-N removal efficiency was enhanced over 10% in the same HRT and SRT conditions as those of control and zeo-SBR reactors. The ammonium adsorption capacity was found to be 6-7 mg NH4(+)-N/g FSS that is equivalent to 40 mg NH4(+)-N/L of ammonium nitrogen removal.
[1]
O. Lahav,et al.
Ammonium removal using ion exchange and biological regeneration
,
1998
.
[2]
P. S. Porter,et al.
AMMONIUM REMOVAL BY ION EXCHANGE: USING BIOLOGICALLY RESTORED REGENERANT
,
1979
.
[3]
Michael J. Semmens,et al.
Modeling ammonium exchange and regeneration on clinoptilolite
,
1981
.
[4]
H. D. Stensel,et al.
Design and retrofit of wastewater treatment plants for biological nutrient removal
,
1992
.
[5]
G. Farquhar,et al.
Factors Affecting Ammonia Removal by Clinoptilolite
,
1973
.
[6]
R. B. Dean,et al.
AMMONIUM REMOVAL FROM SECONDARY EFFLUENTS BY SELECTIVE ION-EXCHANGE
,
1970
.
[7]
P. Nielsen.
Adsorption of ammonium to activated sludge
,
1996
.
[8]
Kwang Victor Lo,et al.
Removal of nitrogen from swine manure wastewaters by ammonia stripping
,
1995
.
[9]
D. Pak,et al.
Ammonium exchange and bioregeneration of bio-flocculated zeolite in a sequencing batch reactor
,
1999,
Biotechnology Letters.
[10]
X. Hao,et al.
Ammonium removal from landfill leachate by chemical precipitation
,
1999
.
[11]
Michal Green,et al.
Biological-ion exchange process for ammonium removal from secondary effluent
,
1996
.