The Nature of the Refutation Text Effect: An Investigation of Attention Allocation

ABSTRACT Students often hold misconceptions that conflict with scientific explanations. Research has shown that refutation texts are effective for facilitating conceptual change in these cases (Guzzetti, Snyder, Glass, & Gamas, 1993). The process through which refutation texts have their effect is not clear. The authors replicated and extended previous research investigating cognitive processes involved in the refutation text effect. Undergraduates read either a refutation or an expository text on seasonal change. Individual reading times were recorded. Participants’ conceptions were measured at pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest. Results showed that readers spent less time reading the refutation paragraph compared to the expository paragraph. The refutation text group had fewer misconceptions at posttest. These findings suggest that refutation text processing differences mirror similar findings in the attention literature, which may account for their effectiveness.

[1]  Julie F. Pallant,et al.  SPSS Survival Manual , 2020 .

[2]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models in Cognitive Science , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  E. Goetz,et al.  Differences in the use of selective attention by more successful and less successful tenth-grade readers. , 1990 .

[4]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[5]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[6]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Engaging Texts: Effects of Concreteness on Comprehensibility, Interest, and Recall in Four Text Types. , 2000 .

[7]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effects of Relevance Instructions and Verbal Ability on Text Processing , 2009 .

[8]  Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.  Causal and Epiphenomenal Use of the Selective Attention Strategy in Prose Comprehension , 1993 .

[9]  Matthew T. McCrudden,et al.  Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text , 2007 .

[10]  D. McNamara,et al.  The Impact of Science Knowledge, Reading Skill, and Reading Strategy Knowledge on More Traditional “High-Stakes” Measures of High School Students’ Science Achievement , 2007 .

[11]  B. Zimmerman.  Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective , 1998 .

[12]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[13]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  Argument and conceptual engagement , 2003 .

[15]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[16]  M. Limón.  On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal , 2001 .

[17]  W. Brewer,et al.  Theories of Knowledge Restructuring in Development , 1987 .

[18]  P. Broek,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Comprehension of Science Texts : The Role of Co-Activation in Confronting Misconceptions , 2008 .

[19]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[20]  Ernest T. Goetz,et al.  Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story. Technical Report No. 266. , 1982 .

[21]  Barbara J. Guzzetti,et al.  Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education , 1993 .

[22]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[23]  Irene-Anna N. Diakidoy,et al.  Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change , 2003 .

[24]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  The role of instructional variables in conceptual change in high school physics topics , 1994 .

[25]  C. Kardash,et al.  Effects of Preexisting Beliefs and Repeated Readings on Belief Change, Comprehension, and Recall of Persuasive Text , 1995 .

[26]  Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.  Effect of Interest on Attention and Learning , 1988 .

[27]  P. Broek,et al.  The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[29]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Effects of epistemological beliefs and learning text structure on conceptual change. , 2007 .

[30]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[31]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility. , 1991 .

[32]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  Effects of Prior Knowledge Activation Modes and Text Structure on Nonscience Majors’ Comprehension of Physics , 1989 .

[33]  Janice,et al.  Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge , 1998 .

[34]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[35]  Lucia Mason,et al.  On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. , 2008 .

[36]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  The Effects of Readers' Misconceptions on Comprehension of Scientific Text , 2005 .

[37]  Mirjamaija Mikkilä-Erdmann,et al.  Science Learning Through Text: The Effect of Text Design and text Comprehension Skills on Conceptual Change , 2002 .

[38]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Text structure and reading time for sentences , 1980 .

[39]  S. Vosniadou.  On the Nature of Naïve Physics , 2002 .

[40]  P. Broek,et al.  The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. , 1999 .

[41]  P. K. Murphy.  What Makes a Text Persuasive? Comparing Students' and Experts' Conceptions of Persuasiveness. , 2001 .

[42]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance , 1997 .

[43]  Cynthia R. Hynd,et al.  Refutational texts and the change process , 2001 .

[44]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change , 2004 .

[45]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning , 2005 .

[46]  R. Reynolds.  Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research , 1992 .