New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies: The Diffusion of Geo‐Information Technologies in Dutch Public Organizations

Some 25 years after the introduction of the first geo-information technologies in public organizations, strategies to manage their diffusion are still inadequate. This is problematic in light of the new generation of geo-information technologies that has become available and aims to invest in these new information technologies in order to advance e-government. This study questions how strategies for diffusion of geo-information technologies in public planning organizations can be improved. It shows that classic top-down management often enhances informal diffusion activities that deviate from the formal diffusion strategy. A knowledge management approach, in which geo-information specialists and planners participate in the formation of diffusion policies, can enhance the quality of the formal strategy, thereby preventing deviation and informal diffusion activities. The authors recommend that public planning organizations use this knowledge to improve their diffusion strategies for geo-information technologies.

[1]  R. Anthony,et al.  Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis , 1965 .

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[4]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[5]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Management by groping along , 1988 .

[6]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[7]  Nancy J. Obermeyer,et al.  Bureaucratic factors in the adoption of gis by public organizations: Preliminary evidence from public administrators and planners☆ , 1990 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[9]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[11]  William E. Huxhold,et al.  An introduction to urban geographic information systems , 1991 .

[12]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Planning and Control , 1991 .

[13]  I. Masser,et al.  Diffusion and Use of Geographic Information Technologies , 1993 .

[14]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Implementing GIS for Planning Lessons from the History of Technological Innovation , 1993 .

[15]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[16]  E. Sam Overman,et al.  Best Practice Research and Postbureaucratic Reform , 1994 .

[17]  Michael Batty,et al.  Planning support systems and the new logic of computation , 1995 .

[18]  W. Huxhold,et al.  Managing Geographic Information System Projects , 1995 .

[19]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Public Management As Art, Science, and Profession , 1996 .

[20]  Tai O. Chan,et al.  A model of the decision process for GIS adoption and diffusion in a government environment , 1996 .

[21]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Organizational context, social interpretation, and the implementation and consequences of geographic information systems☆ , 1996 .

[22]  David L. McClure.  Improving federal performance in the information era: The information technology management reform act of 1996 , 1997 .

[23]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy safari : a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management , 1998 .

[24]  M. Brown,et al.  A "Smarter, Better, Faster, and Cheaper" Government: Contracting and Geographic Information Systems , 1998 .

[25]  Volker Mahnke,et al.  Processes of Strategic Renewal, Competencies, and the Management of Speed , 1998 .

[26]  Zorica Nedovic-Budic,et al.  The Impact of GIS Technology , 1998 .

[27]  S. Osborne.  Voluntary Organizations and Innovation in Public Services , 1998 .

[28]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[29]  S. Openshaw,et al.  Geographical Information and Planning , 1999 .

[30]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[31]  S. Borins,et al.  What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada , 2000 .

[32]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems,Models,and Visualization Tools , 2001 .

[33]  Eleanor D. Glor,et al.  The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal Volume 6 (2), 2001 KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING INNOVATION IN GOVERNMENT 1 , 2022 .

[34]  B. Rubenstein-Montano,et al.  A systems thinking framework for knowledge management , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  S. Borins,et al.  INNOVATION, SUCCESS AND FAILURE IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: Some methodological reflections , 2001 .

[36]  John Stillwell,et al.  Planning Support Systems in Practice , 2003 .

[37]  A. Farazmand.  Chaos and Transformation Theories: A Theoretical Analysis with Implications for Organization Theory and Public Management , 2003 .

[38]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Information Technology, E-Government, and Institutional Change , 2003 .

[39]  M. Crossan,et al.  Organizational learning and strategic renewal , 2003 .

[40]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[41]  M. Barrett,et al.  Learning in Knowledge Communities:: Managing Technology and Context , 2004 .

[42]  Paul Schot,et al.  Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems , 2005 .

[43]  Clementina Ivan Ungureanu,et al.  The Lisbon Strategy , 2006 .