Fluorescent quantification of terazosin hydrochloride content in human plasma and tablets using second-order calibration based on both parallel factor analysis and alternating penalty trilinear decomposition.

Two second-order calibration methods based on the parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and the alternating penalty trilinear decomposition (APTLD) method, have been utilized for the direct determination of terazosin hydrochloride (THD) in human plasma samples, coupled with the excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Meanwhile, the two algorithms combing with the standard addition procedures have been applied for the determination of terazosin hydrochloride in tablets and the results were validated by the high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. These second-order calibrations all adequately exploited the second-order advantages. For human plasma samples, the average recoveries by the PARAFAC and APTLD algorithms with the factor number of 2 (N=2) were 100.4+/-2.7% and 99.2+/-2.4%, respectively. The accuracy of two algorithms was also evaluated through elliptical joint confidence region (EJCR) tests and t-test. It was found that both algorithms could give accurate results, and only the performance of APTLD was slightly better than that of PARAFAC. Figures of merit, such as sensitivity (SEN), selectivity (SEL) and limit of detection (LOD) were also calculated to compare the performances of the two strategies. For tablets, the average concentrations of THD in tablet were 63.5 and 63.2 ng mL(-1) by using the PARAFAC and APTLD algorithms, respectively. The accuracy was evaluated by t-test and both algorithms could give accurate results, too.

[1]  H. Lepor,et al.  The mechanism of adverse events associated with terazosin: an analysis of the Veterans Affairs cooperative study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Bruce R. Kowalski,et al.  A second‐order standard addition method with application to calibration of a kinetics–spectroscopic sensor for quantitation of trichloroethylene , 1995 .

[3]  M. A. Herrador,et al.  Intra-laboratory testing of method accuracy from recovery assays. , 1999, Talanta.

[4]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  Alternating penalty trilinear decomposition algorithm for second‐order calibration with application to interference‐free analysis of excitation–emission matrix fluorescence data , 2005 .

[5]  R. Bro,et al.  A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models , 2003 .

[6]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  An efficient algorithm for PARAFAC of three-way data with large numbers of observation units , 1991 .

[7]  R. Yu,et al.  Determination of Daunomycin in Human Plasma and Urine by Using an Interference-free Analysis of Excitation-Emission Matrix Fluorescence Data with Second-Order Calibration , 2006, Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry.

[8]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  Second-Order Standard Addition Method Based on Alternating Trilinear Decomposition , 2000 .

[9]  A. Dauer.  Terazosin: an effective once-daily monotherapy for the treatment of hypertension. , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  Alejandro C. Olivieri,et al.  Standard error of prediction in parallel factor analysis of three-way data , 2004 .

[11]  K. Booksh,et al.  Excitation-emission matrix fluorescence based determination of carbamate pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , 1999 .

[12]  J. Kalivas,et al.  Selectivity and Related Measures for nth-Order Data. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  Daniel C. Harris,et al.  Quantitative Chemical Analysis , 1968, Nature.

[14]  Alejandro C Olivieri,et al.  Interference-free analysis using three-way fluorescence data and the parallel factor model. Determination of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in human serum. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  J. A. Arancibia,et al.  Second-order advantage achieved with four-way fluorescence excitation-emission-kinetic data processed by parallel factor analysis and trilinear least-squares. Determination of methotrexate and leucovorin in human urine. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  A. Espinosa-Mansilla,et al.  Determinations of fluoroquinolones and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in urine by extractive spectrophotometry and photoinduced spectrofluorimetry using multivariate calibration. , 2005, Analytical biochemistry.

[17]  A. Ahmed,et al.  Effect of Terazosin on Clinical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Older Adults , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  Avraham Lorber,et al.  Analytical figures of merit for tensorial calibration , 1997 .

[19]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  On the self‐weighted alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm—the property of being insensitive to excess factors used in calculation , 2001 .

[20]  Bruce R. Kowalski,et al.  The Generalized Standard Addition Method. , 1979 .

[21]  L. Fernández,et al.  Determination of terazosin by cloud point extraction-fluorimetric combined methodology. , 2007, Talanta.

[22]  J. Chang,et al.  Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .

[23]  Alejandro C Olivieri,et al.  Computing sensitivity and selectivity in parallel factor analysis and related multiway techniques: the need for further developments in net analyte signal theory. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  Gary D. Christian,et al.  Application of the method of rank annihilation to fluorescent multicomponent mixtures of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons , 1980 .

[25]  Ji-xiang He,et al.  Study of the interaction between terazosin and serum albumin: Synchronous fluorescence determination of terazosin , 2002 .

[26]  K. Yuen,et al.  Improved high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of terazosin in human plasma. , 2000, Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications.

[27]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Advances in second‐order calibration , 1993 .

[28]  A. Zavitsanos,et al.  Enantioselective determination of terazosin in human plasma by normal phase high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[29]  T. V. Kumar,et al.  Determination of terazosin in human plasma, using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[30]  N. M. Faber,et al.  The price paid for the second‐order advantage when using the generalized rank annihilation method (GRAM) , 2001 .

[31]  P. Meffin,et al.  Prazosin determination by high-pressure liquid chromatography using fluorescence detection. , 1979, Journal of chromatography.

[32]  A. Lorber.  Error propagation and figures of merit for quantification by solving matrix equations , 1986 .

[33]  F. X. Rius,et al.  Determination of carbendazim, fuberidazole and thiabendazole by three-dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence and parallel factor analysis , 2003 .

[34]  Hai-Long Wu,et al.  An alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm with application to calibration of HPLC–DAD for simultaneous determination of overlapped chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons , 1998 .

[35]  Rolf Sundberg,et al.  Second-order calibration: bilinear least squares regression and a simple alternative , 1998 .