Non-natural ruthenium isotope ratios of the undeclared 2017 atmospheric release consistent with civilian nuclear activities

[1]  G. Steinhauser,et al.  Identification of a chemical fingerprint linking the undeclared 2017 release of 106Ru to advanced nuclear fuel reprocessing , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  A. Mathieu,et al.  Atmospheric modeling and source reconstruction of radioactive ruthenium from an undeclared major release in 2017 , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M. Bruggeman,et al.  Airborne concentrations and chemical considerations of radioactive ruthenium from an undeclared major nuclear release in 2017 , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  F Gering,et al.  An episode of Ru-106 in air over Europe, September-October 2017 - Geographical distribution of inhalation dose over Europe. , 2019, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[5]  R. Borodin,et al.  Some results of determining the source and reasons for the appearance of 106Ru in Russia in September-October 2017 , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[6]  V. M. Shershakov,et al.  Assessment of Possible Location Ru-106 Source in Russia in September–October 2017 , 2019, Russian Meteorology and Hydrology.

[7]  G. Steinhauser,et al.  Chemical and radioanalytical investigations of 106Ru-containing air filters from Vienna in fall 2017: searching for stable element anomalies , 2018, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

[8]  Jens Havskov Sørensen,et al.  Method for source localization proposed and applied to the October 2017 case of atmospheric dispersion of Ru-106. , 2018, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[9]  T Karhunen,et al.  Potential Source Apportionment and Meteorological Conditions Involved in Airborne 131I Detections in January/February 2017 in Europe. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  T. Kleine,et al.  Nature of late accretion to Earth inferred from mass-dependent Ru isotopic compositions of chondrites and mantle peridotites , 2018, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

[11]  E. Cartlidge.  Isotope cloud linked to failed neutrino source. , 2018, Science.

[12]  R. Gopalakrishnan.  Summary of IAEA safety standards series no. SSG-42: Specific Safety guide on 'safety of nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities' (May 2017) , 2017 .

[13]  S. Hanson,et al.  Measurements of extinct fission products in nuclear bomb debris: Determination of the yield of the Trinity nuclear test 70 y later , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  T. Kleine,et al.  Ruthenium stable isotope measurements by double spike MC-ICPMS , 2016 .

[15]  S. Farinon,et al.  SOX: search for short baseline neutrino oscillations with Borexino , 2016 .

[16]  M. Meyer.  SOX - Towards the Detection of Sterile Neutrinos in Borexino : Beta Spectrum Modeling, Monte Carlo Development and Sensitivity Studies for the Sterile Neutrino Search in Borexino , 2016 .

[17]  F. Stanley,et al.  Determination of initial fuel state and number of reactor shutdowns in archived low-burnup uranium targets , 2016, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry.

[18]  A. Gerasimov,et al.  Production of High Specific Activity 144Ce for Artificial Sources of Antineutrinos , 2014 .

[19]  D. Franco,et al.  Proposed search for a fourth neutrino with a PBq antineutrino source. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[20]  Michael Berglund,et al.  Isotopic compositions of the elements 2009 (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2011 .

[21]  F. Albarède,et al.  Overview and general concepts , 2004 .

[22]  J. C. Evans,et al.  Investigation of Isotopic Signatures for Sources of Groundwater Contamination at the Hanford Site , 2002 .

[23]  K. Rosman,et al.  The Oklo natural reactors: cumulative fission yields and nuclear characteristics of Reactor Zone 9 , 1988 .

[24]  H. Thode,et al.  Cumulative yields of stable and long-lived isotopes of ruthenium and palladium in neutron-induced fission , 1978 .

[25]  J. Hoefs.  Stable Isotope Geochemistry , 1973 .