Estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by the Friedewald equation is adequate for classifying patients on the basis of nationally recommended cutpoints.

We compared low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) values obtained by the Friedewald formula--i.e., total cholesterol minus high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol minus very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (estimated as triglyceride divided by 5)--with those obtained by lipoprotein fractionation, using 4736 specimens. When triglycerides were less than 2.0 g/L, greater than 90% of estimated LDL cholesterol values were acceptable, within +/- 10% of measured values. At triglyceride concentrations of 2.0-4.0 g/L and 4.0-6.0 g/L, only 72% and 39%, respectively, of the estimates were acceptable. LDL values derived from an alternative formula, estimating VLDL as triglycerides divided by 6, were even less accurate. Nevertheless, the use of estimated LDL for risk classification based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel cutpoints of 1.30 and 1.60 g/L was considered acceptable. At triglyceride concentrations less than or equal to 5.0 g/L, 88% of classifications based on estimated LDL (using triglycerides divided by 5) were concordant with those by measured LDL. Eleven percent of classifications were shifted across one cutpoint, evenly distributed between high and low. Fewer than 1% of classifications, all with Type III hyperlipoproteinemia, were misclassified two cutpoints high. Refinements in the estimation model did not substantially improve LDL estimation or concordance of risk classification.

[1]  E. Schaefer,et al.  Lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in the plasma of human subjects as measured in the fed and fasted states. , 1988, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  A. Rao,et al.  Calculation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with use of triglyceride/cholesterol ratios in lipoproteins compared with other calculation methods. , 1988, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  W. Fujimoto.  Friedewald's LDL-cholesterol estimation formula in a Japanese American population. , 1988, Japanese circulation journal.

[4]  Y. Hata,et al.  Application of Friedewald's LDL-cholesterol estimation formula to serum lipids in the Japanese population. , 1986, Japanese circulation journal.

[5]  E. DeLong,et al.  A comparison of methods for the estimation of plasma low- and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study. , 1986 .

[6]  M. Schinella,et al.  The Friedewald formula: statistical acrobatics? , 1986, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  K. Schray,et al.  Estimation of low-density lipoprotein by the Friedewald formula and by electrophoresis compared. , 1985, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  Y. Friedlander,et al.  Calculation of LDL-cholesterol from total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol: a comparison of methods in the Jerusalem Lipid Research Clinic Prevalence Study. , 1982, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[9]  P. Wilson,et al.  Estimation of very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from data on triglyceride concentration in plasma. , 1981, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  Myers Lh,et al.  Mathematical evaluation of methods for estimation of the concentration of the major lipid components of human serum lipoproteins. , 1976 .

[11]  R. Levy,et al.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. , 1972, Clinical chemistry.

[12]  Plasma lipoproteins. Part B: Characterization, cell biology, and metabolism. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[13]  Warnick Gr.  Enzymatic methods for quantification of lipoprotein lipids. , 1986 .

[14]  R. Havel,et al.  Mathematical evaluation of methods for estimation of the concentration of the major lipid components of human serum lipoproteins. , 1976, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.