Design and utility of a web-based computer-assisted instructional tool for neuroanatomy self-study and review for physical and occupational therapy graduate students.

The cadaver continues to be the primary tool to teach human gross anatomy. However, cadavers are not available to students outside of the teaching laboratory. A solution is to make course content available through computer-assisted instruction (CAI). While CAI is commonly used as an ancillary teaching tool for anatomy, use of screen space, annotations that obscure the image, and restricted interactivity have limited the utility of such teaching tools. To address these limitations, we designed a Web-based CAI tool that optimizes use of screen space, uses annotations that do not decrease the clarity of the images, and incorporates interactivity across different operating systems and browsers. To assess the design and utility of our CAI tool, we conducted a prospective evaluation of 43 graduate students enrolled in neuroanatomy taught by the Divisions of Physical and Occupational Therapy at the University of Utah, College of Health. A questionnaire addressed navigation, clarity of the images, benefit of the CAI tool, and rating of the CAI tool compared to traditional learning tools. Results showed that 88% of the respondents strongly agreed that the CAI tool was easy to navigate and overall beneficial. Eighty-four percent strongly agreed that the CAI tool was educational in structure identification and had clear images. Furthermore, 95% of the respondents thought that the CAI tool was much to somewhat better than traditional learning tools. We conclude that the design of a CAI tool, with minimal limitations, provides a useful ancillary tool for human neuroanatomy instruction.

[1]  Jason Henry,et al.  The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Teaching Biomechanics of the Temporomandibular Joint , 1999 .

[2]  J Halama,et al.  Evaluation of Web‐based Computer‐aided Instruction in a Basic Science Course , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[4]  Chien Chou,et al.  Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  Martin Predavec,et al.  Evaluation of E-Rat, a computer-based rat dissection, in terms of student learning outcomes , 2001 .

[6]  Rod Sims,et al.  Interactivity: A Forgotten Art? , 1997 .

[7]  Claire Stanley,et al.  A web-based breastfeeding education program. , 2003, The Journal of perinatal education.

[8]  John B Ludlow,et al.  A comparison of slide/audiotape and Web-based instructional formats for teaching normal intraoral radiographic anatomy. , 2003, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[9]  W E Erkonen,et al.  Evaluation of a Computer‐Based Program for Teaching Cardiac Anatomy , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[10]  E. Palmer,et al.  Computer‐aided learning: an overvalued educational resource? , 1999, Medical education.

[11]  Geoff Norman,et al.  Learning anatomy: do new computer models improve spatial understanding? , 1999 .

[12]  E. Bukowski Assessment outcomes: computerized instruction in a human gross anatomy course. , 2002, Journal of allied health.

[13]  Julia F. Guy,et al.  Using interactive videodiscs to teach gross anatomy to undergraduates at the Ohio State University , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  W. Stanford,et al.  Cardiac anatomy instruction by ultrafast computed tomography versus cadaver dissection. , 1992, Investigative Radiology.

[15]  S. Toth-Cohen Computer-assisted instruction as a learning resource for applied anatomy and kinesiology in the occupational therapy curriculum. , 1995, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[16]  K. Schultze,et al.  Cadaver and Computer Use in the Teaching of Gross Anatomy in Physical Therapy Education , 1999 .

[17]  W. Cottam,et al.  Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[18]  S. Barker Comparison of effectiveness of interactive videodisc versus lecture-demonstration instruction. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[19]  D. J. Lowrie,et al.  Survey of gross anatomy, microscopic anatomy, neuroscience, and embryology courses in medical school curricula in the United States , 2002, The Anatomical record.