Power to Choose? An Analysis of Consumer Inertia in the Residential Electricity Market

Many jurisdictions around the world have deregulated utilities and opened retail markets to competition. However, inertial decisionmaking can diminish consumer benefits of retail competition. Using household-level data from the Texas residential electricity market, we document evidence of consumer inertia. We estimate an econometric model of retail choice to measure two sources of inertia: (1) search frictions/inattention, and (2) a brand advantage that consumers afford the incumbent. We find that households rarely search for alternative retailers, and when they do search, households attach a brand advantage to the incumbent. Counterfactual experiments show that low-cost information interventions can notably increase consumer surplus.

[1]  M. Keane Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior , 1997 .

[2]  Leemore S. Dafny,et al.  Let Them Have Choice: Gains from Shifting Away from Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance and Toward an Individual Exchange , 2010 .

[3]  Bart J. Bronnenberg,et al.  Mapping Online Consumer Search , 2009 .

[4]  Eugenio J. Miravete,et al.  Sinking, Swimming, or Learning to Swim in Medicare Part D. , 2012, The American economic review.

[5]  Ali Hortacsu,et al.  Testing Models of Consumer Search using Data on Web Browsing and Purchasing Behavior , 2009 .

[6]  H. Allcott,et al.  The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation , 2012 .

[7]  Christopher Neilson,et al.  Targeted Vouchers, Competition Among Schools, and the Academic Achievement of Poor Students , 2013 .

[8]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[9]  M. Waterson,et al.  Consumer Choice and Competition Policy: a Study of UK Energy Markets a , 2005 .

[10]  Justine S. Hastings,et al.  Fettered Consumers and Sophisticated Firms: Evidence from Mexico&Apos;S Privatized Social Security Market , 2012 .

[11]  Sendhil Mullainathan,et al.  Comparison Friction: Experimental Evidence from Medicare Drug Plans , 2011, The quarterly journal of economics.

[12]  Ignacio Palacios-Huerta,et al.  Consumer Inertia, Choice Dependence, and Learning from Experience in a Repeated Decision Problem , 2014, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  Steven L. Puller,et al.  Do Extrinsic Incentives Undermine Social Norms? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Energy Conservation , 2017 .

[14]  C. Waddams Searching and Switching : Empirical estimates of consumer behaviour in regulated markets , 2014 .

[15]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES STATE DEPENDENCE AND ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR CONSUMER INERTIA , 2009 .

[16]  Koichiro Ito,et al.  Do Consumers Respond to Marginal or Average Price? Evidence from Nonlinear Electricity Pricing , 2012 .

[17]  J. Gruber,et al.  Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program , 2009, The American economic review.

[18]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market , 2002 .

[19]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  Why do we need electricity retailers?; or, can you get it cheaper wholesale? , 2000 .

[20]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Product Differentiation, Search Costs, and Competition in the Mutual Fund Industry: A Case Study of S&P 500 Index Funds , 2003 .

[21]  B. Handel Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts. , 2013, The American economic review.

[22]  Monica Giulietti,et al.  Estimation of Search Frictions in the British Electricity Market , 2014 .

[23]  Han Hong,et al.  Using price distributions to estimate search costs , 2006 .

[24]  Justine S. Hastings,et al.  Heterogeneous Preferences and the Efficacy of Public School Choice , 2008 .

[25]  Catherine D. Wolfram,et al.  Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1999 .

[26]  B. Bernheim,et al.  Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics , 2008 .

[27]  Sergei Koulayev,et al.  Search for Differentiated Products: Identification and Estimation , 2014 .

[28]  Andrew Sweeting,et al.  Market Power in the England and Wales Wholesale Electricity Market 1995-2000 , 2004 .

[29]  Sanjog Misra,et al.  Disentangling Preferences and Learning in Brand Choice Models , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[30]  Elisabeth Honka,et al.  Advertising, Consumer Awareness, and Choice: Evidence from the U.S. Banking Industry , 2016 .

[31]  K. Small,et al.  Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models , 1979 .

[32]  Ali Hortacsu,et al.  Search with Learning , 2013 .

[33]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Understanding strategic bidding in multi‐unit auctions: a case study of the Texas electricity spot market , 2008 .

[34]  Severin Borenstein,et al.  The Redistributional Impact of Non-Linear Electricity Pricing , 2010 .

[35]  Catherine Waddams Price,et al.  Do Consumers Switch to the Best Supplier , 2007 .

[36]  Eugenio J. Miravete Choosing the Wrong Calling Plan? Ignorance and Learning , 2003 .

[37]  Justine S. Hastings,et al.  Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments , 2007 .

[38]  James Bushnell,et al.  Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured U.S. Electricity Markets , 2005 .

[39]  T. Brennan,et al.  Consumer Preference Not to Choose: Methodological and Policy Implications , 2005 .

[40]  Justine S. Hastings,et al.  Advertising and Competition in Privatized Social Security: The Case of Mexico ∗ , 2011 .

[41]  Matthijs R. Wildenbeest,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Search Costs , 2006 .

[42]  Ryan Kellogg,et al.  What Do Consumers Believe About Future Gasoline Prices? , 2011 .