Design Approach for Heavy-Duty Soft-Robotic-Gripper

Abstract Increased product customization based on customer requirements results in a large number of variants and thus smaller batch sizes in production. In order to maintain a flexible and dynamic interlinkage within a production system in terms of industry 4.0, it is necessary to implement flexible and adaptive handling and gripping solutions into the production process. A suitable way of integrating more flexibility into production is the use of compliant soft-robotic gripping systems, which are characterized by a high adaptability in terms of workpieces’ shape, size and structure compared to state-of-the-art grippers. Current focus in research refers on design and simulation of the repeatability of soft-robotic grippers with low payload capability, such as silicone-based Soft-Pneumatic-Actuators (SPA). Design and process parameters of soft-robotic grippers with higher payload capability, such as Fin Ray®, are usually revealed through time-consuming empirical test series. This paper demonstrates the potential of a new simulation-based approach in designing soft-robotic grippers for heavy-duty applications to reveal crucial design and process parameters with low effort and without empirical test series.

[1]  Jürgen Hesselbach,et al.  Model based design of process-specific handling tools for workpieces with many variants in shape and material , 2016 .

[2]  Jamie Paik,et al.  Modeling, Design, and Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators with Finite Element Method   , 2016 .

[3]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Polyurethane: vielseitige Materialien und nachhaltige Problemlöser für aktuelle Anforderungen , 2013 .

[4]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Self-healing soft pneumatic robots , 2017, Science Robotics.

[5]  Mats Jackson,et al.  Bending angle prediction and control of soft pneumatic actuators with embedded flex sensors: a data-driven approach , 2017 .

[6]  YapHong Kai,et al.  High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications , 2016 .

[7]  MajidiCarmel,et al.  Soft Robotics: A Perspective—Current Trends and Prospects for the Future , 2014 .

[8]  Mike Wilson,et al.  Festo drives automation forwards , 2011 .

[9]  Tianmiao Wang,et al.  A Soft Bionic Gripper with Variable Effective Length , 2018, Journal of Bionic Engineering.

[10]  Mariangela Manti,et al.  Stiffening in Soft Robotics: A Review of the State of the Art , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[11]  Stefan Seelecke,et al.  Design and Validation of a Reconfigurable Robotic End-Effector Based on Shape Memory Alloys , 2019, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[13]  Martin Riedel,et al.  Reconfigurable Self-optimising Handling System , 2010, IPAS.

[14]  Hyungmin Park,et al.  A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model for chloroprene rubber , 2012 .

[15]  William C. Messner,et al.  Fin Ray® Effect Inspired Soft Robotic Gripper: From the RoboSoft Grand Challenge toward Optimization , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[16]  Thomas J. Wallin,et al.  3D printing of soft robotic systems , 2018, Nature Reviews Materials.

[17]  D. Floreano,et al.  Soft Robotic Grippers , 2018, Advanced materials.

[18]  Donald Ruffatto,et al.  A Soft Robotic Gripper With Gecko-Inspired Adhesive , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.