An Integrated Assessment of the Impacts of Hydrogen Economy on Transportation, Energy Use, and Air Emissions

This paper presents an analysis of the potential system-wide energy and air emissions implications of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle (H 2-FCV) penetration into the U.S. light duty vehicle (LDV) fleet. The analysis uses the U.S. EPA MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) technology database and model to simultaneously consider competition among alternative technologies and fuels, with a focus on the transportation and the electric sectors. Our modeled reference case suggests that economics alone would not yield H2-FCV penetration by 2030. A parametric sensitivity analysis shows that H2-FCV can become economically viable through reductions in H 2-FCV costs, increases in the costs of competing vehicle technologies, and increases in oil prices. Alternative scenarios leading to H2-FCV penetration are shown to result in very different patterns of total system energy usage depending on the conditions driving H2-FCV penetration. Overall, the model suggests that total CO2 emissions changes are complex, but that CO2 emission levels tend to decrease slightly with H2-FCV penetration. While carbon capture and sequestration technologies with H 2 production and renewable technologies for H2 production have the potential to achieve greater CO2 reductions, these technologies are not economically competitive within our modeling time frame without additional drivers

[1]  Adrian Cho Fire and ICE: Revving Up for H2 , 2004, Science.

[2]  David L. Greene,et al.  Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Transportation , 2003 .

[3]  J. Ogden PROSPECTS FOR BUILDING A HYDROGEN ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE , 1999 .

[4]  C. Wene Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[5]  W. Colella,et al.  Cleaning the Air and Improving Health with Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Vehicles , 2005, Science.

[6]  John B. Heywood,et al.  ON THE ROAD IN 2020 - A LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF NEW AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[7]  Ad Seebregts,et al.  Energy/Environmental Modeling with the MARKAL Family of Models , 2002 .

[8]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[9]  J. Cotrell,et al.  Hydrogen Storage in Wind Turbine Towers: Cost Analysis and Conceptual Design; Preprint , 2003 .

[10]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Multi-regional technological learning in the energysystems MARKAL model , 2002 .

[11]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[12]  Kerry-Ann Adamson,et al.  Hydrogen from renewable resources--the hundred year commitment , 2004 .

[13]  L. Schrattenholzer,et al.  Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling , 1999 .

[14]  Paul B. Weisz,et al.  Basic Choices and Constraints on Long-Term Energy Supplies , 2004 .

[15]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Modeling Technological Change: Implications for the Global Environment , 1999 .

[17]  Michael Wang,et al.  Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts , 2002 .

[18]  J. Ogden Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: a Southern California case study , 1999 .

[19]  L. J. Fingersh Optimized Hydrogen and Electricity Generation from Wind , 2003 .

[20]  Vinod K. Natarajan,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Fuel Cell Cars , 2003 .