Towards an Understanding of FLOSS: Infrastructures, Materiality and the Digital Business Ecosystem

In this paper we present empirical work detailing the engagement practices of a large FLOSS project, the Digital Business Ecosystem (DBE). In common with many other FLOSS projects, the DBE project focused on the development of infrastructural software components. Infrastructures and FLOSS software exhibit multiplicity: as objects they both change and stay the same. Whilst the implications of multiplicity with respect to infrastructure have been well-documented, with respect to FLOSS, they remain under-explored. Through examining how the DBE engaged new participants we were able to explore the nature of the FLOSS software object by asking the implied question: engagement with what? We draw on recent analysis by Law and Singleton to show how the innovative yet non-existent potentiality of the DBE was as signifi cant to engagement as its steadily growing codebase. We argue that acknowledging the materiality and immateriality of the FLOSS software object has important consequences for management of, and engagement with, FLOSS projects.

[1]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[2]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[3]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Governing diversity in the digital ecosystem , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[4]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Is Re-modernization Occurring - And If So, How to Prove It? , 2003 .

[5]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  A framework analysis of the open source software development paradigm , 2000, ICIS.

[6]  Norman Balabanian,et al.  The Golem at large: what you should know about technology , 1999, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[7]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Object lessons and invisible technologies , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  F. Nachira.  Towards a Network of Digital Business Ecosystems Fostering the Local Development , 2002 .

[9]  P. Gummett.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1988 .

[10]  Matt Ratto,et al.  Embedded Technical Expression: Code and the Leveraging of Functionality , 2005, Inf. Soc..

[11]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  B. Latour,et al.  Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? , 1986 .

[13]  Anna Sidorova,et al.  SURVIVAL OF OPEN-SOURCE PROJECTS: A POPULATION ECOLOGY PERSPECTIVE , 2003 .

[14]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations , 1994 .

[15]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[16]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[17]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Reopening the Black Box of Technology Artifacts and Human Agency , 2002, ICIS.

[18]  Daniel Gustavo Mocelin.  Reseña de "The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. Nova York: Random House, 2001" de HIMANEN, Pekka , 2008 .

[19]  John Law,et al.  Fluids or flows? Information and qualculation in medical practice , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[20]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[21]  Daniel Neyland,et al.  Dismissed Content and Discontent , 2006 .

[22]  Anteneh Ayanso,et al.  Diversity or Identity Crisis? An Examination of Leading IS Journals , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Scaling Information Infrastructure: The Case of Next Generation IP in Internet , 1998, Inf. Soc..

[24]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[25]  B. Latour.  Aramis, or the Love of Technology , 1993 .

[26]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[27]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Can We Get Our Materialism Back, Please? , 2007, Isis.

[28]  M. Castells,et al.  The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age , 2001 .

[29]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware and teamwork: invisible aid or technical hindrance? , 1997 .

[30]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  The open source software phenomenon: Characteristics that promote research , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[33]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[34]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[35]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Management of Large Software Development Efforts , 1980, MIS Q..

[36]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[37]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  On the interpretative flexibility of hosted ERP systems , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Sven Behnke,et al.  The soul of a new machine , 1999 .

[39]  R. Briggs,et al.  Association for Information Systems , 2009 .

[40]  Philip H. Dorn,et al.  The Soul of a New Machine , 1982, Annals of the History of Computing.

[41]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[42]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Narrative Networks: Patterns of Technology and Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[43]  J. Fleck.  Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology☆ , 1994 .

[44]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[45]  J. Law.  After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology , 1999 .

[46]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[47]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[48]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[49]  A. Bruni,et al.  Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor Network Theory , 2007 .

[50]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[51]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From tool to Gestell: agendas for managing the information infrastructure , 1998 .

[52]  Mike Michael,et al.  Prepublication Copy of , 2009 .

[53]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[54]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  Code quality analysis in open source software development , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[55]  S. Gordon,et al.  The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery , 1991 .

[56]  H Scottgordon.  The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery , 1991 .

[57]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .