Most practical applications of statistical methods are based on the implicit assumption that if an event has a very small probability, then it cannot occur. For example, the probability that a kettle placed on a cold stove would start boiling by itself is not 0, it is positive, but it is so small, that physicists conclude that such an event is simply impossible. This assumption is difficult to formalize in traditional probability theory, because this theory only describes measures on sets and does not allow us to divide functions into 'random' and non-random ones. This distinction was made possible by the idea of algorithmic randomness, introduce by Kolmogorov and his student Martin- Loef in the 1960s. We show that this idea can also be used for inverse problems. In particular, we prove that for every probability measure, the corresponding set of random functions is compact, and, therefore, the corresponding restricted inverse problem is well-defined. The resulting techniques turns out to be interestingly related with the qualitative esthetic measure introduced by G. Birkhoff as order/complexity.
[1]
D. Bridges,et al.
Constructive functional analysis
,
1979
.
[2]
R. Dubisch.
A MATHEMATICAL APPROACH TO AESTHETICS
,
1941
.
[3]
G. Birkhoff.
Mathematics and Psychology
,
1969
.
[4]
Ming Li,et al.
An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications
,
2019,
Texts in Computer Science.
[5]
R. Granovskaya,et al.
Perception of Forms and Forms of Perception
,
1987
.
[6]
David S. Johnson,et al.
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
,
1978
.
[7]
Vladik Kreinovich,et al.
Algorithms That Still Produce a Solution (Maybe Not Optimal) Even When Interrupted: Shary's Idea Justified
,
1998,
Reliab. Comput..
[8]
Anil K. Shukla.
Mathematics of aesthetics
,
1987
.
[9]
A. N. Tikhonov,et al.
Solutions of ill-posed problems
,
1977
.