A Lagrangian, stochastic modeling framework for multi-phase flow in porous media

Many of the complex physical processes relevant for compositional multi-phase flow in porous media are well understood at the pore-scale level. In order to study CO"2 storage in sub-surface formations, however, it is not feasible to perform simulations at these small scales directly and effective models for multi-phase flow description at Darcy scale are needed. Unfortunately, in many cases it is not clear how the micro-scale knowledge can rigorously be translated into consistent macroscopic equations. Here, we present a new methodology, which provides a link between Lagrangian statistics of phase particle evolution and Darcy scale dynamics. Unlike in finite-volume methods, the evolution of Lagrangian particles representing small fluid phase volumes is modeled. Each particle has a state vector consisting of its position, velocity, fluid phase information and possibly other properties like phase composition. While the particles are transported through the computational domain according to their individual velocities, the properties are modeled via stochastic processes honoring specified Lagrangian statistics. Note that the conditional expectations of the particle velocities are different for different fluid phases. The goal of this paper is to present the general framework for this alternative modeling approach. Various one and two-dimensional numerical experiments demonstrate that with appropriate stochastic rules the particle solutions are consistent with a standard two-phase Darcy flow formulation. In the end, we demonstrate how to model non-equilibrium phenomena within the stochastic particle framework, which will be the main focus of the future work.

[1]  Morris Muskat,et al.  Physical principles of oil production , 1949 .

[2]  Scher,et al.  Simulation and theory of two-phase flow in porous media. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[3]  P. Kloeden,et al.  Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations , 1992 .

[4]  W. Kinzelbach,et al.  Coupling of transport and chemical processes in numerical transport models , 1989 .

[5]  D. Misra,et al.  Modeling plume behavior for nonlinearly sorbing solutes in saturated homogeneous porous media , 1998 .

[6]  C. R. Cole,et al.  Multicomponent mass transport model: theory and numerical implementation (discrete-parcel-random-walk version) , 1977 .

[7]  Quan Zhang,et al.  On the computation of ensemble averages for spatially non-uniform particle systems , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Reactive transport and immiscible flow in geological media. I. General theory , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[9]  T. A. Prickett,et al.  A "random-walk" solute transport model for selected groundwater quality evaluations , 1981 .

[10]  Andrew F. B. Tompson,et al.  Numerical simulation of solute transport in three-dimensional, randomly heterogeneous porous media , 1990 .

[11]  Thomas A. Hewett,et al.  Theory for the semi-analytical calculation of oil recovery and effective relative permeabilities using streamtubes , 1997 .

[12]  Patrick Jenny,et al.  A multiblock joint PDF finite-volume hybrid algorithm for the computation of turbulent flows in complex geometries , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[13]  G. Z. Hornberger,et al.  A three-dimensional method-of-characteristics solute-transport model (MOC3D) , 1996 .

[14]  Daniel J. Goode,et al.  Particle velocity interpolation in block‐centered finite difference groundwater flow models , 1990 .

[15]  Cesar Zarcone,et al.  Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  D. W. Pollock Semianalytical Computation of Path Lines for Finite‐Difference Models , 1988 .

[17]  Rudolf Hilfer,et al.  Dimensional analysis of pore scale and field scale immiscible displacement , 1996 .

[18]  Jinchao Xu,et al.  Assessment of Numerical Accuracy of PDF/Monte Carlo Methods for Turbulent Reacting Flows , 1999 .

[19]  R. Ewing,et al.  Characteristic adaptive subdomain methods for reservoir flow problems , 1990 .

[20]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Stochastic Formulation for Uncertainty Analysis of Two-Phase Flow in Heterogeneous Reservoirs , 2000 .

[21]  Amvrossios C. Bagtzoglou,et al.  Projection functions for particle‐grid methods , 1992 .

[22]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  A Streamline-Based 3D Field-Scale Compositional Reservoir Simulator , 1997 .

[23]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation , 1990 .

[24]  T. F. Russell,et al.  An overview of research on Eulerian-Lagrangian localized adjoint methods (ELLAM). , 2002 .

[25]  T. F. Russell,et al.  An Eulerian-Lagrangian localized adjoint method for the advection-diffusion equation , 1990 .

[26]  Frederick Delay,et al.  Simulating Solute Transport in Porous or Fractured Formations Using Random Walk Particle Tracking: A Review , 2005 .

[27]  Richard E. Ewing,et al.  Eulerian-Lagrangian Localized Adjoint Methods for a Nonlinear Advection-Diffusion Equation , 1994 .

[28]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Reactive transport and immiscible flow in geological media. II. Applications , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  S. Pope PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .