Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action

We discuss findings from an ethnographic study of instant messaging (IM) in the workplace and its implications for media theory. We describe how instant messaging supports a variety of informal communication tasks. We document the affordances of IM that support flexible, expressive communication. We describe some unexpected uses of IM that highlight aspects of communication which are not part of current media theorizing. They pertain to communicative processes people use to connect with each other and to manage communication, rather than to information exchange. We call these processes "outeraction". We discuss how outeractional aspects of communication affect media choice and patterns of media use.

[1]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[2]  John C. Tang,et al.  Supporting distributed groups with a Montage of lightweight interactions , 1994, CSCW '94.

[3]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  TeleNotes: managing lightweight interactions in the desktop , 1997, TCHI.

[4]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC's RAVE system , 1992, CHI.

[5]  DourishPaul,et al.  Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication , 1996 .

[6]  Christian Heath,et al.  Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment , 1991, CHI.

[7]  E. Schegloff.  Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[8]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[9]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment , 1993, CACM.

[10]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[12]  Owen Daly-Jones,et al.  Informal workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it? , 1994, CHI '94.

[13]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Experiences in the use of a media space , 1991, CHI.

[14]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[16]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  The adoption and use of BABBLE: A field study of chat in the workplace , 1999, ECSCW.

[17]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[18]  C. Goodwin.  Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers , 1981 .

[19]  Sara A. Bly,et al.  It's all in the words: supporting work activites with lightweight tools , 1999, GROUP '99.

[20]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[21]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Design for individuals, design for groups: tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness , 1998, CSCW '98.

[22]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  People's reactions to technology in factories, offices, and aerospace , 1990 .

[23]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.

[24]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[25]  David M. Frohlich,et al.  Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[26]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[27]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work , 1994, TOIS.

[28]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .