Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Are We on the Path to Avoiding the Administration of Contrast Media?

In recent years, cardiovascular imaging examinations have experienced exponential growth due to technological innovation, and this trend is consistent with the most recent chest pain guidelines. Contrast media have a crucial role in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, allowing for more precise characterization of different cardiovascular diseases. However, contrast media have contraindications and side effects that limit their clinical application in determinant patients. The application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques to CMR imaging has led to the development of non-contrast models. These AI models utilize non-contrast imaging data, either independently or in combination with clinical and demographic data, as input to generate diagnostic or prognostic algorithms. In this review, we provide an overview of the main concepts pertaining to AI, review the existing literature on non-contrast AI models in CMR, and finally, discuss the strengths and limitations of these AI models and their possible future development.

[1]  P. Parizel,et al.  Artificial Intelligence to Reduce or Eliminate the Need for Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Brain and Cardiac MRI , 2023, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Exploring the EVolution in PrognOstic CapabiLity of MUltisequence Cardiac MagneTIc ResOnance in PatieNts Affected by Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Based on Machine Learning Analysis , 2023, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[3]  C. Pieper,et al.  A novel and simple cardiac magnetic resonance score (PE2RT) predicts outcome in takotsubo syndrome , 2023, European Radiology.

[4]  P. Babyn,et al.  Applications of deep learning to reduce the need for iodinated contrast media for CT imaging: a systematic review , 2023, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[5]  Matthew J. Middione,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Cardiac MRI: A Review , 2023, Bioengineering.

[6]  V. Novikov,et al.  2022 Esc Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: What is New? , 2022, Cardiac Arrhythmias.

[7]  A. Kastrup,et al.  Artificial intelligence-driven ASPECTS for the detection of early stroke changes in non-contrast CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[8]  W. Burchert,et al.  A Machine Learning Challenge: Detection of Cardiac Amyloidosis Based on Bi-Atrial and Right Ventricular Strain and Cardiac Function , 2022, Diagnostics.

[9]  A. Bozzao,et al.  Synthetic Post-Contrast Imaging through Artificial Intelligence: Clinical Applications of Virtual and Augmented Contrast Media , 2022, Pharmaceutics.

[10]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Machine learning approach in diagnosing Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: The role of the combined evaluation of atrial and ventricular strain, and parametric mapping. , 2022, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  G. Pontone,et al.  Application of AI in cardiovascular multimodality imaging , 2022, Heliyon.

[12]  Iulia A. Popescu,et al.  Artificial Intelligence for Contrast-Free MRI: Scar Assessment in Myocardial Infarction Using Deep Learning–Based Virtual Native Enhancement , 2022, Circulation.

[13]  M. Barnes,et al.  Predicting post-contrast information from contrast agent free cardiac MRI using machine learning: Challenges and methods , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[14]  G. Pontone,et al.  Role of cardiac MRI in the diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor‐associated myocarditis , 2022, International journal of cancer.

[15]  G. Pontone,et al.  The emerging role of atrial strain assessed by cardiac MRI in different cardiovascular settings: an up-to-date review , 2022, European Radiology.

[16]  A. Lalande,et al.  Prediction of Myocardial Infarction From Patient Features With Machine Learning , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[17]  J. Garot,et al.  Machine-Learning Score Using Stress CMR for Death Prediction in Patients With Suspected or Known CAD. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[18]  J. Suri,et al.  Long-COVID diagnosis: From diagnostic to advanced AI-driven models , 2022, European Journal of Radiology.

[19]  R. Kwong,et al.  Multiparametric Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Approach in Diagnosing, Monitoring, and Prognostication of Myocarditis. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Non-contrast Cine Cardiac Magnetic Resonance image radiomics features and machine learning algorithms for myocardial infarction detection , 2021, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[21]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  CinE caRdiac magneTic resonAnce to predIct veNTricular arrhYthmia (CERTAINTY) , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[22]  B. Stieltjes,et al.  Atri-U: assisted image analysis in routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance volumetry of the left atrium , 2021, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[23]  J. Núñez,et al.  Risk score for early risk prediction by cardiac magnetic resonance after acute myocardial infarction. , 2021, International journal of cardiology.

[24]  J. Suri,et al.  Atrial Strain by Feature-Tracking Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Features, Feasibility, and Reproducibility , 2021, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[25]  E. Oikonomou,et al.  Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging-principles, expectations, and limitations. , 2021, European heart journal.

[26]  J. McMurray,et al.  2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. , 2021, European heart journal.

[27]  Iulia A. Popescu,et al.  Toward Replacing Late Gadolinium Enhancement With Artificial Intelligence Virtual Native Enhancement for Gadolinium-Free Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characterization in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy , 2021, Circulation.

[28]  G. La Torre,et al.  The future direction of imaging in prostate cancer: MRI with or without contrast injection , 2021, Andrology.

[29]  J. Suri,et al.  Artificial intelligence in computed tomography plaque characterization: A review. , 2021, European journal of radiology.

[30]  G. Collins,et al.  Clinical prediction models: diagnosis versus prognosis. , 2021, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  J. Suri,et al.  Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2021, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[32]  G. Pontone,et al.  Could CMR Tissue-Tracking and Parametric Mapping Distinguish Between Takotsubo Syndrome and Acute Myocarditis? A Pilot Study. , 2021, Academic radiology.

[33]  J. Suri,et al.  Imaging in COVID-19-related myocardial injury , 2020, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[34]  D. Fine,et al.  Use of Intravenous Gadolinium-based Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. , 2020, Radiology.

[35]  D. Pennell,et al.  SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[36]  Iulia A. Popescu,et al.  Standardization of T1-mapping in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using clustered structuring for benchmarking normal ranges. , 2020, International journal of cardiology.

[37]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. , 2020, European heart journal.

[38]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Differentiation of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy , 2020, Current Heart Failure Reports.

[39]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  State of the Art: Imaging for Myocardial Viability: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[40]  E. Di Ruggiero,et al.  Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature , 2020, BMC medical ethics.

[41]  B. Meskó,et al.  The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database , 2020, npj Digital Medicine.

[42]  F. Cheng,et al.  Applications of artificial intelligence in multimodality cardiovascular imaging: A state-of-the-art review. , 2020, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[43]  E. Nagel,et al.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update , 2020, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[44]  Xuan V Nguyen,et al.  Noninterpretive Uses of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology. , 2020, Academic radiology.

[45]  El-Sayed H. Ibrahim,et al.  Practical Guide to Evaluating Myocardial Disease by Cardiac MRI. , 2020, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  G. Pontone,et al.  Prognostic Value of Repeating Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Acute Myocarditis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  C. Basso,et al.  Septal Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Arrhythmic Risk in Genetic and Acquired Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathies. , 2019, Heart, lung & circulation.

[48]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Machine learning in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: basic concepts and applications , 2019, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[49]  Peter B. Jones,et al.  Development and validation of multivariable prediction models of remission, recovery, and quality of life outcomes in people with first episode psychosis: a machine learning approach. , 2019, The Lancet. Digital health.

[50]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Artificial Intelligence Will Transform Cardiac Imaging—Opportunities and Challenges , 2019, Front. Cardiovasc. Med..

[51]  T. Leiner,et al.  Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging: state of the art and implications for the imaging cardiologist , 2019, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[52]  Jason Craft,et al.  Water–fat separation and parameter mapping in cardiac MRI via deep learning with a convolutional neural network , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[53]  A. Faron,et al.  Comparison of Original and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria for Diagnosis of Acute Myocarditis: Results of a Validation Cohort. , 2019, Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging.

[54]  Nan Feng Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Chronic Myocardial Infarction on Nonenhanced Cardiac Cine MRI. , 2019, Radiology.

[55]  D. de Roure,et al.  Epistemological and Bibliometric Analysis of Ethics and Shared Responsibility—Health Policy and IoT Systems , 2019, Sustainability.

[56]  D. Comaniciu,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[57]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  Direct delineation of myocardial infarction without contrast agents using a joint motion feature learning architecture , 2018, Medical Image Anal..

[58]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Nonischemic Myocardial Inflammation: Expert Recommendations. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  A. Arai,et al.  Prevalence and prognosis of ischaemic and non-ischaemic myocardial fibrosis in older adults , 2018, European heart journal.

[60]  C. Antoniades,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[61]  C. Bucciarelli-Ducci,et al.  Native T1 mapping to detect extent of acute and chronic myocardial infarction: comparison with late gadolinium enhancement technique , 2018, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[62]  J. Cornel,et al.  The Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[63]  Reza Nezafat,et al.  Automated Cardiac MR Scar Quantification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[64]  C. Kramer,et al.  Myocardial Viability Testing to Guide Coronary Revascularization. , 2018, Interventional cardiology clinics.

[65]  Zhi-gang Yang,et al.  Native T1 mapping for characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarction in swine: Comparison with contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[66]  D. Moratal,et al.  Texture analysis of cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging to detect nonviable segments in patients with chronic myocardial infarction , 2018, Medical physics.

[67]  J. Gagné Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[68]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Texture analysis and machine learning of non-contrast T1-weighted MR images in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-Preliminary results. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[69]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[70]  Graham W. Taylor,et al.  Deep Multimodal Learning: A Survey on Recent Advances and Trends , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[71]  Amit R. Patel,et al.  Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[72]  Andrés Larroza,et al.  Differentiation between acute and chronic myocardial infarction by means of texture analysis of late gadolinium enhancement and cine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[73]  M. Nacif,et al.  Myocardial Viability on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance , 2017, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[74]  R. Chan,et al.  Prognostic Value of LGE-CMR in HCM: A Meta-Analysis. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[75]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[76]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Multi-Reader Multi-Case Studies Using the Area under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve as a Measure of Diagnostic Accuracy: Systematic Review with a Focus on Quality of Data Reporting , 2014, PloS one.

[77]  S. Raman,et al.  Prevalence and distribution of late gadolinium enhancement in a large population of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: effect of age and left ventricular systolic function , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[78]  Scott D Flamm,et al.  Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[79]  A. Bryll,et al.  Ischemic and non-ischemic patterns of late gadolinium enhancement in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction , 2013, Cardiology journal.

[80]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2012 .

[81]  A. Sato,et al.  The clinical impact of late gadolinium enhancement in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: serial analysis of cardiovascular magnetic resonance images , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[82]  Ali Yilmaz,et al.  Significance of Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) , 2007, Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen.

[83]  Annette M. Molinaro,et al.  Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods , 2005, Bioinform..

[84]  Hannah van Kolfschooten EU Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges for Patients’ Rights , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[85]  Heye Zhang,et al.  Segmentation and quantification of infarction without contrast agents via spatiotemporal generative adversarial learning , 2020, Medical Image Anal..

[86]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Subacute and Chronic Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar: Accuracy of Texture Analysis on Nonenhanced Cine MR Images. , 2018, Radiology.

[87]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..