The Double-Edged Sword of Public-Resource Dependence: The Impact of Public Resources on Autonomy and Legitimacy in Korean Cultural Nonprofit Organizations

As governments and nonprofit organizations build close partnerships for the provision of public services, they become interdependent in many ways. In particular, nonprofits' public-resource dependence has significant implications for their behavior and decisions. By examining Korean cultural nonprofit organizations (CNPOs), this article posits a theoretical framework for the impact of public-resource dependence on nonprofits' organizational autonomy and legitimacy. The empirical results of national survey data of Korean cultural nonprofits suggest that public-resource dependence has a dual effect, reducing managerial autonomy while enhancing institutional legitimacy. Korean CNPOs seem to be constrained by public funding granted by both local governments and the central government, particularly in goal setting, resource allocations, and program choices. However, public funding also helps nonprofits earn institutional legitimacy through its reputation and recognition effects.

[1]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[2]  M. J. Moon Cultural Governance , 2001 .

[3]  Karen A. Froelich Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations , 1999 .

[4]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[5]  J. Massey,et al.  Managing Organizational Legitimacy: Communication Strategies for Organizations in Crisis , 2001 .

[6]  Ruth-Blandina M. Quinn Distance or intimacy?—The arm's length principle, the British government and the arts council of Great Britain 1 , 1997 .

[7]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Public Opinion and Political Vulnerability: Why Has the National Endowment for the Arts Been Such an Attractive Target? , 1999 .

[8]  Michael J. Rushton,et al.  Public Funding of Controversial Art , 2000 .

[9]  M. O'hare,et al.  The Impact of the National Endowment for the Arts in the United States: Institutional and Sectoral Effects on Private Funding , 2004 .

[10]  B. Frey State Support and Creativity in the Arts: Some New Considerations , 1999 .

[11]  Pan Suk Kim,et al.  NGOs as Incubator of Participative Democracy in South Korea: Political, Voluntary, and Policy Participation , 2003 .

[12]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Substance and Symbolism in CEOs' Long-Term Incentive Plans , 1994 .

[13]  A. Zimmer,et al.  The Subsidized Muse: Government and the Arts in Western Europe and the United States , 1999 .

[14]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Does Isomorphism Legitimate? , 1996 .

[15]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Fools Rush in? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation , 1994 .

[16]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness , 1986 .

[17]  W. Scott,et al.  A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments , 1998 .

[18]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[19]  Harry Brighouse Neutrality, Publicity, and State Funding of the Arts , 1995 .

[20]  Keith S. Snavely,et al.  Mapping Local Government-Nongovernmental Organization Interactions: A Conceptual Framework , 2001 .

[21]  Kimberly D. Elsbach MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN THE CALIFORNIA CATTLE INDUSTRY - THE CONSTRUCTION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VERBAL ACCOUNTS , 1994 .

[22]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations , 1992 .

[23]  J. Saidel,et al.  Resource interdependence : the relationship between state agencies and nonprofit organizations , 1991 .