Removing bias from LiDAR-based estimates of canopy height: Accounting for the effects of pulse density and footprint size

Abstract Airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) is used in forest inventories to quantify stand structure with three dimensional point clouds. However, the structure of point clouds depends not only on stand structure, but also on the LiDAR instrument, its settings, and the pattern of flight. The resulting variation between and within datasets (particularly variation in pulse density and footprint size) can induce spurious variation in LiDAR metrics such as maximum height (hmax) and mean height of the canopy surface model (Cmean). In this study, we first compare two LiDAR datasets acquired with different parameters, and observe that hmax and Cmean are 56 cm and 1.0 m higher, respectively, when calculated using the high-density dataset with a small footprint. Then, we present a model that explains the observed bias using probability theory, and allows us to recompute the metrics as if the density of pulses were infinite and the size of the two footprints were equivalent. The model is our first step in developing methods for correcting various LiDAR metrics that are used for area-based prediction of stand structure. Such methods may be particularly useful for monitoring forest growth over time, given that acquisition parameters often change between inventories.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  Marc Simard,et al.  Canopy Height Model (CHM) Derived From a TanDEM-X InSAR DSM and an Airborne Lidar DTM in Boreal Forest , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2008 .

[4]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches , 2007 .

[5]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Multispectral and LiDAR data fusion for fuel type mapping using Support Vector Machine and decision rules , 2011 .

[6]  Scott D. Roberts,et al.  Detection of regularly spaced targets in small-footprint LIDAR data: Research issues for consideration , 2001 .

[7]  D. A. Crouse,et al.  Horizontal resolution and data density effects on remotely sensed LIDAR-based DEM , 2006 .

[8]  K. Lim,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests , 2003 .

[9]  Antero Kukko,et al.  Effect of incidence angle on laser scanner intensity and surface data. , 2008, Applied optics.

[10]  Hannu Hyyppä,et al.  Reconstructing tree crowns from laser scanner data for feature extraction , 2002 .

[11]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[12]  Marek K. Jakubowski,et al.  Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy , 2013 .

[13]  Menas Kafatos,et al.  Estimating stem volume and biomass of Pinus koraiensis using LiDAR data , 2010, Journal of Plant Research.

[14]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods , 2006 .

[15]  S. Popescu.  Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne lidar , 2007 .

[16]  P. Treitz,et al.  Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density , 2006 .

[17]  Sylvie Durrieu,et al.  PTrees: A point-based approach to forest tree extraction from lidar data , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[18]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Simulating the impact of discrete-return lidar system and survey characteristics over young conifer and broadleaf forests , 2010 .

[19]  Y. H. Shikoku,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF FOOTPRINT SIZE AND SAMPLING DENSITY IN AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING TO EXTRACT INDIVIDUAL TREES IN MOUNTAINOUS TERRAIN , 2004 .

[20]  M. Nilsson.  Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[21]  K. Itten,et al.  LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management , 2004 .

[22]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Comparisons between field- and LiDAR-based measures of stand structural complexity , 2010 .

[23]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Development of a simulation model to predict LiDAR interception in forested environments , 2007 .

[24]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Area-based vs tree-centric approaches to mapping forest carbon in Southeast Asian forests from airborne laser scanning data , 2017 .

[25]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data , 2010 .

[26]  J. Reitberger,et al.  3D segmentation of single trees exploiting full waveform LIDAR data , 2009 .

[27]  G. Asner,et al.  Mapping tropical forest carbon: Calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric , 2014 .

[28]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach , 2013 .

[29]  M. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[30]  S. Popescu,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass : A scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers , 2009 .

[31]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Waveform lidar over vegetation: An evaluation of inversion methods for estimating return energy , 2015 .

[32]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[33]  R. Fournier,et al.  Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data , 2015 .

[34]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  A Guide to LIDAR Data Acquisition and Processing for the Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 2008 .

[35]  K. Lim,et al.  Operational implementation of a LiDAR inventory in Boreal Ontario , 2011 .

[36]  P. Krzystek,et al.  Tree species classification and estimation of stem volume and DBH based on single tree extraction by exploiting airborne full-waveform LiDAR data , 2012 .

[37]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Reliability of LiDAR derived predictors of forest inventory attributes: A case study with Norway spruce , 2010 .

[38]  P. Tarolli,et al.  Suitability of LiDAR point density and derived landform curvature maps for channel network extraction , 2010 .

[39]  Txomin Hermosilla,et al.  Analysis of the Influence of Plot Size and LiDAR Density on Forest Structure Attribute Estimates , 2014 .

[40]  E. Næsset.  Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[41]  Johan E. S. Fransson,et al.  Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse density of laser data , 2007 .

[42]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Effects of Pulse Density on Digital Terrain Models and Canopy Metrics Using Airborne Laser Scanning in a Tropical Rainforest , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[43]  K. Lim,et al.  Predicting forest stand variables from LiDAR data in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence forest of Ontario , 2008 .

[44]  K. Lim,et al.  Examining the effects of sampling point densities on laser canopy height and density metrics , 2008 .

[45]  K. Ioki,et al.  Estimating stand volume in broad-leaved forest using discrete-return LiDAR: plot-based approach , 2009, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[46]  J. Holmgren.  Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[47]  Norman A. Bourg,et al.  CTFS‐ForestGEO: a worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change , 2015, Global change biology.

[48]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval , 2005 .

[49]  Ross K. Meentemeyer,et al.  Effects of LiDAR point density and landscape context on estimates of urban forest biomass , 2015 .