Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to validate a triaxial accelerometer setup for identifying everyday physical activity types (ie, sitting, standing, walking, walking stairs, running, and cycling). METHODS Seventeen subjects equipped with triaxial accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3X+) at the thigh and hip carried out a standardized test procedure including walking, running, cycling, walking stairs, sitting, and standing still. A method was developed (Acti4) to discriminate between these physical activity types based on threshold values of standard deviation of acceleration and the derived inclination. Moreover, the ability of the accelerometer placed at the thigh to detect sitting posture was separately validated during free living by comparison with recordings of pressure sensors in the hip pockets. RESULTS Sensitivity for discriminating between the physical activity types sitting, standing, walking, running, and cycling in the standardized trials were 99%-100% and 95% for walking stairs. Specificity was higher than 99% for all activities. During free living (140 hours of measurements), sensitivity and specificity for detection of sitting posture were 98% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION The developed method for detecting physical activity types showed a high sensitivity and specificity for sitting, standing, walking, running, walking stairs, and cycling in a standardized setting and for sitting posture during free living.

[1]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Johannes Peltola,et al.  Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[3]  H. Burr,et al.  Prolonged standing at work and hospitalisation due to varicose veins: a 12 year prospective study of the Danish population , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[4]  G. Hansson,et al.  Validity and reliability of triaxial accelerometers for inclinometry in posture analysis , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  K. Carlsen,et al.  Validity of physical activity monitors in adults participating in free-living activities , 2008, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[6]  J. Salonen,et al.  Standing at work and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  C. Matthews,et al.  Measurement of adults' sedentary time in population-based studies. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Francisca Galindo Garre,et al.  Evaluation of neural networks to identify types of activity using accelerometers. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  C. Bouchard,et al.  Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Kuan Zhang,et al.  Measurement of human daily physical activity. , 2003, Obesity research.

[11]  B. G. Celler,et al.  Classification of basic daily movements using a triaxial accelerometer , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  G. ÓLaighin,et al.  Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  M. Hamer,et al.  Walking and primary prevention: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[14]  Rebecca Hardy,et al.  Objective measures of physical capability and subsequent health: a systematic review , 2010, Age and ageing.

[15]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Robert J. Brychta,et al.  Validation Of The Actigraph (GT3X) Inclinometer Function: 2045 , 2010 .

[17]  J. Fahrenberg,et al.  Assessment of posture and motion by multichannel piezoresistive accelerometer recordings. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[18]  M. Granat,et al.  The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[19]  K. Westerterp,et al.  Physical Activity Assessment With Accelerometers: An Evaluation Against Doubly Labeled Water , 2007, Obesity.

[20]  Caroline B. Terwee,et al.  Physical Activity Questionnaires for Adults , 2010, Sports medicine.

[21]  P Asterland,et al.  Questionnaire versus direct technical measurements in assessing postures and movements of the head, upper back, arms and hands. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[22]  K. Aminian,et al.  Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation , 1999, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[23]  Michael J Thun,et al.  American Journal of Epidemiology Original Contribution Leisure Time Spent Sitting in Relation to Total Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of Us Adults , 2022 .

[24]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[25]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: a validation study. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[26]  K R Westerterp,et al.  Comparison of two questionnaires with a tri-axial accelerometer to assess physical activity patterns. , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.

[27]  Maria Hagströmer,et al.  The repeatability and validity of questionnaires assessing occupational physical activity--a systematic review. , 2011, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[28]  Bruce K Armstrong,et al.  International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Validity and Repeatability of the Epic Physical Activity Questionnaire: a Validation Study Using Accelerometers as an Objective Measure , 2007 .